Stanislav Ochotnicky (sochotni...@redhat.com) said:
> I believe most of them have already been taken (by me, Alexander
> Kurtakov or someone else). But a list of the remainining would be nice
> of course.
Sure, here you go (obviously, some of this is more eclipse-focused rather
than core java):
Excerpts from Bill Nottingham's message of Thu Sep 02 20:15:12 +0200 2010:
> Stanislav Ochotnicky (sochotni...@redhat.com) said:
> > Agenda TBD, but for now the idea is to:
> > * go through Tasks listed on [1]
>
> Can non-SIG members add tasks?
I don't see why not, as long as we are able to und
Stanislav Ochotnicky (sochotni...@redhat.com) said:
> Agenda TBD, but for now the idea is to:
> * go through Tasks listed on [1]
Can non-SIG members add tasks? If we have a Java SIG, I'd like there
to be some agreement on how to handle orphaned packages - right
now, we've got about 30 java packa
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> > * AutoQA - QA guys are struggling with their effort to get their stuff
> > running from Fedora packages (shame on us if we can't make our own stuff
> > run from our packages)
> > * Name it :)
>
> At my work, first thing that happens with Java is
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> * AutoQA - QA guys are struggling with their effort to get their stuff running
> from Fedora packages (shame on us if we can't make our own stuff run from our
> packages)
> * Name it :)
At my work, first thing that happens with Java is that Openj
Excerpts from Kevin Fenzi's message of Wed Sep 01 17:52:30 +0200 2010:
> On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:09:55 +0200
> Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>
> > Excerpts from Stanislav Ochotnicky's message of Mon Aug 30 16:17:40
> > +0200 2010:
> > > I'll be starting Java SIG wiki page soon, plus I guess we can p
Excerpts from Orion Poplawski's message of Wed Sep 01 20:10:35 +0200 2010:
> On 09/01/2010 06:09 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> > Excerpts from Stanislav Ochotnicky's message of Mon Aug 30 16:17:40 +0200
> > 2010:
> >> I'll be starting Java SIG wiki page soon, plus I guess we can peruse
> >> ja
On 09/01/2010 06:09 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Excerpts from Stanislav Ochotnicky's message of Mon Aug 30 16:17:40 +0200
> 2010:
>> I'll be starting Java SIG wiki page soon, plus I guess we can peruse
>> java-devel mailing list for SIG discussions.
>
> In case you missed Alexander's mail th
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:09:55 +0200
Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Excerpts from Stanislav Ochotnicky's message of Mon Aug 30 16:17:40
> +0200 2010:
> > I'll be starting Java SIG wiki page soon, plus I guess we can peruse
> > java-devel mailing list for SIG discussions.
>
> In case you missed Alex
Excerpts from Stanislav Ochotnicky's message of Mon Aug 30 16:17:40 +0200 2010:
> I'll be starting Java SIG wiki page soon, plus I guess we can peruse
> java-devel mailing list for SIG discussions.
In case you missed Alexander's mail the wiki is created [1]
I am planning first IRC meeting. Propos
> I don't currently maintain any Java packages within Fedora but I did
> (somewhat) build the maven2 stack for EPEL[0] and I would be
> interested in seeing a Java SIG happen as well as would definitely
> join up.
>
Please everyone that is interested add yourself to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
I don't have any packages currently that anybody actually uses. I'd love to
join up and help a larger part of the community.
-Eric
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I don't currently maintain any Java packages within Fedora but I did
(somewhat) build the maven2 stack for EPEL[0] and I would be
interested in seeing a Java SIG happen as well as would definitely
join up.
-AdamM
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MavenEPEL
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
On 30 August 2010 15:17, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> There has been an effort few years back to start Java SIG but it didn't
> work out in the end (no idea why). I decided it's time to try again :-)
>
> I would like to start Java SIG for a lot of reasons. Some of them:
>
> * Pa
> On 08/30/2010 07:33 AM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure there are a number of other reasons for such SIG.
>
> Our relationship with jpackage really needs to improve. They do a lot
> of packaging work, we've "borrowed" a lot of that work, and then
> diverged without contributing ba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/30/2010 07:33 AM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> I'm pretty sure there are a number of other reasons for such SIG.
Our relationship with jpackage really needs to improve. They do a lot
of packaging work, we've "borrowed" a lot of that work, and th
> On 30/08/10 15:38, Aditya Patawari wrote:
>
>
> > It would be nice if we can help out newbies as well as other maintainers
> > like me to package and maybe develop java apps.
>
> Similar, am only learning Java (1st Semester in College finished)
> But would like to learn to package Java apps l
> On 30/08/10 15:38, Aditya Patawari wrote:
>
>
> > It would be nice if we can help out newbies as well as other maintainers
> > like me to package and maybe develop java apps.
>
> Similar, am only learning Java (1st Semester in College finished)
> But would like to learn to package Java apps l
On 30/08/10 15:38, Aditya Patawari wrote:
> It would be nice if we can help out newbies as well as other maintainers
> like me
> to package and maybe develop java apps.
>
Similar, am only learning Java (1st Semester in College finished)
But would like to learn to package Java apps like Azureus
Hi,
I would love to join and contribute to any such SIG. I am a package
maintainer but I am not maintaining any Java package as of now. It would be
nice if we can help out newbies as well as other maintainers like me to
package and maybe develop java apps.
--
Aditya Patawari
http://yaps.co.in
htt
> Hi everyone,
>
> There has been an effort few years back to start Java SIG but it didn't
> work out in the end (no idea why). I decided it's time to try again :-)
>
> I would like to start Java SIG for a lot of reasons. Some of them:
>
> * Packaging guidelines are in need of an update (badly)
21 matches
Mail list logo
