On 21-05-2024 18:04, Dominik Wombacher wrote:
On 05/21/2024 5:54 PM CEST Tom Hughes via devel
wrote:
The automatic tar ball URLs on github just do a git archive and are
separate to uploaded release artifacts. Just use a URL like:
https://github.com/OWNER/PROJECT/archive/REVISION/NAME.tar.
> On 05/21/2024 5:54 PM CEST Tom Hughes via devel
> wrote:
>
> The automatic tar ball URLs on github just do a git archive and are
> separate to uploaded release artifacts. Just use a URL like:
>
>https://github.com/OWNER/PROJECT/archive/REVISION/NAME.tar.gz
>
> where tag can be any tag or
On 21/05/2024 16:37, Dominik Wombacher wrote:
I have a case were upstream excludes the test suite from the export [1].
But I want the tests to be part of the package build to validate that
everything is fine.
So this requires a bit of local git clone and create an own archive file.
I can't just
> On 05/08/2024 10:38 PM CEST Tom Hughes via devel
> wrote:
>
>
> On 08/05/2024 21:36, Kenneth Goldman wrote:
>
> > Is it possible for a .spec file to clone a github.com repo rather than
> > download a tarball? Can someone link to a working example?
>
> No, but github can give you a tar bal
* Kenneth Goldman:
> Is it possible for a .spec file to clone a github.com repo rather than
> download a tarball? Can someone link to a working example?
There is Packit, which I think can be configured in such a way that you
can work with sources directly. The service pushes auto-generated
com
Am 09.05.24 um 17:21 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 4:36 PM Kenneth Goldman wrote:
Is it possible for a .spec file to clone a github.com repo rather than
download a tarball? Can someone link to a working example?
Git clones are bulky, with the entire history of a project
On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 11:21:11AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 4:36 PM Kenneth Goldman wrote:
> >
> > Is it possible for a .spec file to clone a github.com repo rather than
> > download a tarball? Can someone link to a working example?
>
> Git clones are bulky, with
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 4:36 PM Kenneth Goldman wrote:
>
> Is it possible for a .spec file to clone a github.com repo rather than
> download a tarball? Can someone link to a working example?
Git clones are bulky, with the entire history of a project rather than
merely the state of the repo at the
discussions related to Fedora
Datum: 9. 5. 2024 1:14:32
Předmět: Re: Spec file using github repo - not tarball
"Hello,
yes it is possible to refer to the git commit.
For example https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/yara/blob/rawhide/f/yara.spec
(I mostly use stable releases, but time to time I have to s
Hello,
yes it is possible to refer to the git commit.
For example https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/yara/blob/rawhide/f/yara.spec
(I mostly use stable releases, but time to time I have to switch to a git
snapshot during major version stabilization or when there is some public
vulnerability anno
Kenneth,
You might be looking for the forge macros:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/#_using_forges_hosted_revision_control
--
Jonathan Steffan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On 08/05/2024 21:36, Kenneth Goldman wrote:
Is it possible for a .spec file to clone a github.com repo rather than
download a tarball? Can someone link to a working example?
No, but github can give you a tar ball for any ref you want so why
would you need/want to?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@co
12 matches
Mail list logo
