* Chris Suszynski [11/07/2024 11:16] :
>
> What's the reason for treating Go differently than other languages?
> Fedora does not patch out calls to sites like npmjs.com, pypi.org,
> rubygems.org or repo.maven.apache.org, doesn't it?
Actually, we do.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dancer2
On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 03:23:56PM +0200, Sébastien Le Roux wrote:
> > Cool!
> Thanks !
> > On page 40, 'cc_args =' is not going to work, that's a syntax error.
> > But a bigger problem is that there's no need to play with -O and -g
> > like that… Meson has builtin -D buildtype=… and it's beter to
Cool!
Thanks !
On page 40, 'cc_args =' is not going to work, that's a syntax error.
But a bigger problem is that there's no need to play with -O and -g
like that… Meson has builtin -D buildtype=… and it's beter to use that.
It also has built-in support e.g. for lto, so it's better to push user
t
On 11/07/2024 13:16, Chris Suszynski wrote:
Fedora does not patch out calls to sites
vcpkg package has telemetry disabled by default.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
Personally I agree with maxwells stance fedora is a privacy friendly distro.
On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 at 12:03, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>
>
> Am 11.07.24 um 1:16 PM schrieb Chris Suszynski:
> >> I support keeping the Google Go module proxy disabled by default. Our
> packages should not send telemetry d
Am 11.07.24 um 1:16 PM schrieb Chris Suszynski:
I support keeping the Google Go module proxy disabled by default. Our packages
should not send telemetry data to Google without explicit opt-in.
What's the reason for treating Go differently than other languages? Fedora does
not patch out call
> I support keeping the Google Go module proxy disabled by default. Our
> packages should not send telemetry data to Google without explicit opt-in.
What's the reason for treating Go differently than other languages? Fedora does
not patch out calls to sites like npmjs.com, pypi.org, rubygems.org
On Tue Dec 19, 2023 at 17:33 +0100, Alejandro Saez Morollon wrote:
> TL;DR: Remove a patch we ship in Go that disables GOPROXY and GOSUMDB and
> follow upstream defaults, or keep it?
I support keeping the Google Go module proxy disabled by default. Our
packages should not send telemetry data to Go
On 25/2/20 20:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:07:15PM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>> Hello team,
>>
>> It looks like spammers use closed bug report for their ads as seen
>> in this one:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644013
>>
>> Can someone mainta
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:07:15PM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> It looks like spammers use closed bug report for their ads as seen
> in this one:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644013
>
> Can someone maintaining bugzilla investigate the issue?
There's a se
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 05:10:37PM +, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> If anyone spots any more, please open a ticket by emailing bugzilla-requests
> @redhat.com and one of us will clean it up.
I just tried that but my email was rejected:
: host mx1.redhat.com[209.132.183.28] said: 554
5.7.1 :
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 7:05 PM Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> If anyone spots any more, please open a ticket by emailing bugzilla-requests
> @redhat.com and one of us will clean it up.
Thanks Alasdair, that's good to know.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@li
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 12:35:17PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> hfjkd1...@gmail.com is another one in RH bugzilla, the same scammers
> are doing the same to the libreoffice bugzilla too
I've cleaned those up and closed the accounts concerned (together with
some other similar ones I found). The
On 11/01/2018 07:23 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A few minutes ago I was notified about a post in a closed bug. It
> turns out that the account that made the post has been sporadically
> spamming various bugs:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=user_activity.html&action=run&
On Thu, 2018-11-01 at 12:23 +0100, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A few minutes ago I was notified about a post in a closed bug. It
> turns out that the account that made the post has been sporadically
> spamming various bugs:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=user_activity.html
I have forwarded this to the Bugzilla owner. Thank you for the research on this.
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 08:20, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> A few minutes ago I was notified about a post in a closed bug. It
> turns out that the account that made the post has been sporadically
> spammin
On 17 July 2017 at 13:34, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do the list admins have any plans to combat the spammers that are spoofing
> Kevin Fenzi to bypass the moderation queue?
>
We are looking into how this is happening. Kevin is not specifically
subscribed as ke...@fedoraproject.org and only a few of the l
Hello,I received two spam emails, one in users and one in devs. Both
are exactly the same.If someone can take care of them, I would be
grateful.
Thanks,Sylvia
On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 10:41 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 07/17/2017 10:34 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> > Do the list admins have an
I have received a few on the development mailing list.
On 17 Jul 2017 6:48 pm, wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
>> I haven't seen any spam on the devel list. I even checked my spam
>> folder. Maybe the messages are being sent directly to you, not the list?
>>
>
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I haven't seen any spam on the devel list. I even checked my spam
folder. Maybe the messages are being sent directly to you, not the
list?
They're being sent to 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org (whatever that
is). I can see in the mail
On 17 July 2017 at 13:34, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do the list admins have any plans to combat the spammers that are spoofing
> Kevin Fenzi to bypass the moderation queue?
>
We are aware of this and have been dealing with whack-a-mole in trying
to fix it.
> Could we please at least hold his messages fo
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:41:13AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> I haven't seen any spam on the devel list. I even checked my spam folder.
> Maybe the messages are being sent directly to you, not the list?
I am getting those messages as well :)
--
Athos Ribeiro
http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr
___
On 07/17/2017 10:34 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
Do the list admins have any plans to combat the spammers that are
spoofing Kevin Fenzi to bypass the moderation queue?
Could we please at least hold his messages for moderation? Maybe he
could manually approve his own messages, as annoying as
excellent!!
2011/10/14 Kevin Fenzi
> I have moderated this user until they can fix their spam issues.
>
> kevin
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
--
Luis Enrique Bazán De León
--
devel mailing list
devel@li
24 matches
Mail list logo
