Re: Snaps and Fedora

2016-08-16 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 02:27:19PM +0200, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote: > I very much share this view. Snaps are just glorified zip files > (squashfs images) that have just enough meta-data to make themselves > useful. Because snaps just declare the integration the particular > implementation can figure

Re: Snaps and Fedora

2016-07-28 Thread Zygmunt Krynicki
> Wiadomość napisana przez Neal Gompa w dniu 23.07.2016, o > godz. 02:46: > > Hello all, > > Over the course of this week, I've been involved in the first Snap > sprint focused on making the Snap system broadly useful and workable > across a wide variety of Linux distributions. While I obvious

Re: Snaps and Fedora

2016-07-23 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Sat, 2016-07-23 at 02:46 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote: > I know that the Workstation WG is very much behind Flatpak right now, > but I see no reason that we cannot offer both. In fact, it is in the > best interests of our users to fully enable both systems to the best > extent we can, so that they ha

Re: Snaps and Fedora

2016-07-22 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Jul 22, 2016 5:48 PM, "Neal Gompa" wrote: > This is done through the "plugs" and "slots" that can be used to > create interfaces among them. This is a true superset of the > capability provided by Flatpak through Portals, since it can be used > to export non-DBus oriented communications mechani

Re: Snaps and Fedora

2016-07-22 Thread Haïkel
http://www.ubuntu.com/legal/contributors 2016-07-23 2:46 GMT+02:00 Neal Gompa : > Hello all, > > Over the course of this week, I've been involved in the first Snap > sprint focused on making the Snap system broadly useful and workable > across a wide variety of Linux distributions. While I obvious