Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> - - Refactorig LLVM's build system to properly use versioned shared
> objects. I note that other distributions, and BSD, are still using
> static linking, so we appear to be the only ones attempting to package
> LLVM properly.
And FYI, this is not just a matter of g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/02/13 21:11, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 04:38 -0500, David Airlie wrote:
>
>>> Given that Mesa depends on LLVM, I suppose brokenness in
>>> anything but Rawhide is not really advisable.
>>>
>>> I'd be happy to give you and Jens
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 04:38 -0500, David Airlie wrote:
> > Given that Mesa depends on LLVM, I suppose brokenness in anything but
> > Rawhide is not really advisable.
> >
> > I'd be happy to give you and Jens co-maintainership though, until a
> > more permanent maintainer steps forward (ideally on
- Original Message -
> From: "Michel Alexandre Salim"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Monday, 25 February, 2013 7:30:56 PM
> Subject: Re: Seeking primary maintainer for LLVM
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/02/13 13:06, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:49:49AM +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
>> - - Refactorig LLVM's build system to properly use versioned
>> shared objects. I note that other distributions, and BSD, are
>>
Thank Michel,
> I will be reducing my involvement in packaging LLVM -- I am no longer
> regularly using it, the work required to keep it up-to-date is
> relatively straightforward, but there are several deficiencies that I
> feel others are better positioned to address:
I am happy to help maintai
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:49:49AM +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> - - Refactorig LLVM's build system to properly use versioned shared
> objects. I note that other distributions, and BSD, are still using
> static linking, so we appear to be the only ones attempting to package
> LLVM properly
