On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 4:42 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 29/09/2021 22:23, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > 1. The two schemes actually order properly. Should I increment the epoch
> > anyway?
>
> No. 2021.09.0+351 is higher than 1.4.1717:
>
> $ rpmdev-vercmp 2021.09.0+351 1.4.1717
> 2021.09.0
On 29/09/2021 22:23, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
1. The two schemes actually order properly. Should I increment the epoch anyway?
No. 2021.09.0+351 is higher than 1.4.1717:
$ rpmdev-vercmp 2021.09.0+351 1.4.1717
2021.09.0+351 > 1.4.1717
2. What should I do with that +351? Do we have a policy about the