Re: Scalability of FE-DEADREVIEW

2015-12-06 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 4.12.2015 v 08:25 James Hogarth napsal(a): > The question on my mind is how useful is that when you reach that number of > things blocking it? Who in their right mind > is going to check one of the thousand or so packages marked blocking that as > a place to start packaging? That's not even >

Re: Scalability of FE-DEADREVIEW

2015-12-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 20:11:00 + Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:06:45AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > You all may also be interested in: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ > I'm a big fan of this web page :) > > > which is what I use at le

Re: Scalability of FE-DEADREVIEW

2015-12-04 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:06:45AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > You all may also be interested in: > > https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ I'm a big fan of this web page :) > which is what I use at least when looking for reviews. > > The ones you are talking about are mostly in the 'h

Re: Scalability of FE-DEADREVIEW

2015-12-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
You all may also be interested in: https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ which is what I use at least when looking for reviews. The ones you are talking about are mostly in the 'hidden' section I would think (ie, have a whiteboard note as 'notready') kevin pgpwl2knCZJW1.pgp Descript

Re: Scalability of FE-DEADREVIEW

2015-12-04 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 07:25:41AM +, James Hogarth wrote: > So with my little one keeping me up all night I figured I could at least be > a little productive. > > It turns out we have just under 1000 bugs against package review in the NEW > state. > > Now if even just half of these don't hav