Re: Scala

2020-12-07 Thread Jerry James
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 11:51 AM Jerry James wrote: > - Figure out if jansi 2.0.1 is backwards compatible with jansi 1.18. If it is > not, then we'll have to figure out how to make parallel installable versions > of jansi 1.18 and 2.0.1, or else port everything currently using 1.18 to > 2.0.

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

2013-09-12 Thread Will Benton
- Original Message - > From: "Antoine Gourlay" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:22:05 AM > Subject: Re: Scala package owner unresponsive > > Do you have the log output of the failing

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

2013-09-12 Thread Antoine Gourlay
rawhide with > these fixes? > > - Original Message - >> From: "Will Benton" >> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" >> >> Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2013 5:26:23 PM >> Subject: Re: Scala package owner unres

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

2013-09-11 Thread Will Benton
If it's more convenient to import a SRPM (of course it is!), I've made one available at http://freevariable.com/scala - Original Message - > From: "Will Benton" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, Septembe

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

2013-09-11 Thread Will Benton
n" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2013 5:26:23 PM > Subject: Re: Scala package owner unresponsive > > I see that scala is on the to-be-retired list unless it starts building from > source. I am intereste

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

2013-09-05 Thread Will Benton
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 6:03:46 AM > Subject: Re: Scala package owner unresponsive > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 09:41:52PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Will Benton wrote: &

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

2013-08-23 Thread Florian Weimer
On 08/22/2013 01:03 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote: Yes, the reason fot this is very simple. On F18 we had a jdk-1.6.0 environment in addition to the jdk-1.7.0. Scala was built explicitly agains jdk-1.6.0 because jdk-1.7.0 is not supported on this release. Really? How did *that* happen? -- Flori

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

2013-08-22 Thread Jochen Schmitt
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 09:41:52PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Will Benton wrote: > > (1) As far as I can tell, the package for Scala 2.9.2 on F19 (2.9.2-2) has > > broken dependencies; I can't install it via yum on my new F19 install. Is > > this the case for

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

2013-08-19 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:41:52 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Will Benton wrote: > > (1) As far as I can tell, the package for Scala 2.9.2 on F19 (2.9.2-2) has > > broken dependencies; I can't install it via yum on my new F19 install. Is > > this the case for anyone

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

2013-08-18 Thread Jerry James
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Will Benton wrote: > (1) As far as I can tell, the package for Scala 2.9.2 on F19 (2.9.2-2) has > broken dependencies; I can't install it via yum on my new F19 install. Is > this the case for anyone else? If so, wouldn't it be best to have a working > Scala 2

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

2013-08-18 Thread Will Benton
into Fedora). best, wb - Original Message - > From: "Jochen Schmitt" > To: codebl...@fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 11:33:32 AM > Subject: Re: Scala package owner unresponsive >

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

2013-08-14 Thread Jochen Schmitt
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 07:12:32AM -0400, Ricky Elrod wrote: > I would like to take over this package and update it to 2.10.x for > Fedora 21 (or possibly 20, though it wouldn't be an official "Change", > because we're past the proposal deadline). If you have a working package for scala you may s