Re: Samsung ml printers

2011-07-07 Thread Raphael Groner
Voila: http://splix.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/splix/splix/ppd/ml1660.ppd An Howto to install this file can be found not only once by using rightly a web search engine of your choice. ;) Have fun. R. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list

Re: Samsung ml printers

2011-07-07 Thread Raphael Groner
> thank you for your advice, but if I install the > openprinting-splix-2.0.0-2lsb3.2.x86_64.rpm (I guess, you meant this), > my printer ML-1660 (USB attached) is not found in the database, so it > is not operable, although I had loaded the kernel module usblp.ko. Oh, the 1660 is not listed at open

Re: Samsung ml printers

2011-07-07 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 17:09:43 +0200, RG (Raphael) wrote: > Suggestion: Just take and use the rpm of openprinting to have fun :) > My Samsung ML-1640 is working well with openprinting. Just out of interest, have you tried the ML-1610 driver from the foomatic database with it. That one has worked fin

Re: Samsung ml printers

2011-07-07 Thread Nathanael D. Noblet
On 07/07/2011 04:00 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: > Attaching Samsung ML printers (e.g. ML-1660) registers such a printer > with an URI as usb://... . But its's not possible to work with such a > printer :-( > > The only way is to use the Samsung package > UnifiedLinuxDriver_0.86.tar.gz. It installs su

Re: Samsung ml printers

2011-07-07 Thread Joachim Backes
On 07/07/2011 05:09 PM, Raphael Groner wrote: > >> Additionally, no splix package available in F15. >> On the other hand, the attach process in *Ubuntu 11.04* leaves a fully >> operable printer without any need for interaction. >> >> Why this difference? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c

Re: Samsung ml printers

2011-07-07 Thread Raphael Groner
> Additionally, no splix package available in F15. > On the other hand, the attach process in *Ubuntu 11.04* leaves a fully > operable printer without any need for interaction. > > Why this difference? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674619 Summary: Maybe others (and me) have tried

Re: Samsung ml printers

2011-07-07 Thread Jos Vos
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 12:00:25PM +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > On the other hand, the attach process in *Ubuntu 11.04* leaves a fully > operable printer without any need for interaction. > > Why this difference? Because the drivers are not open source? -- --Jos Vos --X/OS Experts i