On 16 March 2016 at 12:42, Michal Novotny wrote:
> I must agree that "fedorainfracloud" also sounds to me like the more stable
> variant out of the two (without any previous historical knowledge).
>
Like all bikesheds.. we went through a lot of different names to try
and convey that this was expe
I must agree that "fedorainfracloud" also sounds to me like the more stable
variant out of the two (without any previous historical knowledge).
clime
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:51:21 +0100
> Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
> > Miroslav Suchy venit, v
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:51:21 +0100
Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Miroslav Suchy venit, vidit, dixit 14.03.2016 23:01:
> > There is ongoing discussion on Fedora Infrastructure mailing list,
> > that only fully supported services should remain in
> > fedoraproject.org domain. All experimental services
Miroslav Suchy venit, vidit, dixit 14.03.2016 23:01:
> There is ongoing discussion on Fedora Infrastructure mailing list, that
> only fully supported services should remain in fedoraproject.org domain.
> All experimental services should be moved to fedorainfracloud.org.
> Recently there was suggest
