Dne 2.1.2013 12:08, Stijn Hoop napsal(a):
Hi,
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:59:46 +0100
Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 21.12.2012 20:58, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky napsal(a):
Why don't we just ship 'rvm' or 'rbenv' and force everyone to
manage their own Ruby environments? ;-)
There used to be RVM in Fedora, bu
Hi,
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:59:46 +0100
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 21.12.2012 20:58, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky napsal(a):
> > Why don't we just ship 'rvm' or 'rbenv' and force everyone to
> > manage their own Ruby environments? ;-)
>
> There used to be RVM in Fedora, but we dropped it, since it canno
Dne 21.12.2012 20:58, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky napsal(a):
Sigh ... now there are *three* incompatible Ruby syntax / semantics
"standards" to deal with.
Don't spread FUD please.
Why don't we just ship 'rvm' or 'rbenv' and force everyone to manage
their own Ruby environments? ;-)
There used to
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> According to Ruby 2.0 release schedule:
>
> - code freeze: 23 Dec.
> - 2.0.0-rc1 release: 1W Jan. (expected)
> - 2.0.0-rc2 release: 1W Feb. (expected)
> - 2.0.0-p0 release: 24 Feb.
>
> the official release date is quic
- Original Message -
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:47:56 +0100
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> > Hi everybody,
>
> ...snip...
>
> >- Due to better integration of JRuby into Fedora [3], we would
> > like to take this opportunity to restructure RubyGems folder
> > layout. This should allow u
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:47:56 +0100
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi everybody,
...snip...
>- Due to better integration of JRuby into Fedora [3], we would
> like to take this opportunity to restructure RubyGems folder
> layout. This should allow us to support Rubinius in the future
> as well.
>
