Re: Review requests: gtksourceviewmm3, mingw-qt6-qtlocation

Hi Sandro, I see someone took gtksourceviewmm3, can you swap for apache-logging-parent please? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214834 Also unretirement; bump to latest upstream version. It is a parent POM for metadata so it is a simple one. Cheers, Chris On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 at 08:1

Re: Review requests: perl-Feature-Compat-Class, perl-Feature-Compat-Try (needed for licensecheck update)

On 6/01/2023 13:47, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi licensecheck-3.3.1 grew two new dependencies, reviews here: perl-Feature-Compat-Class: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2158741 perl-Feature-Compat-Try: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2158742 Happy to review

Re: Review requests: mingw-python-pip, mingw-python-wheel, mingw-pyproject-rpm-macros

Hi I'd still appreciate a review of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2136236 - mingw-python-flit-core It is the last dependency required to finish the effort of landing mingw-python-3.11 in rawhide. Thanks! Sandro On 19.10.22 19:32, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi Based on t

Re: Review requests: mingw-python-pip, mingw-python-wheel, mingw-pyproject-rpm-macros

Hi Based on the discussion in #2134021 (mingw-pyproject-rpm-macros review), I've abbandoned the pyproject approach and instead switched to python-build + python-installer. For this, I'd need the following new packages reviewed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2136235 -

Re: Review requests

On 17.02.22 18:36, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: Il 15/02/22 11:15, Sandro Mani ha scritto: Hi I've submitted the two packages which are missing dependencies for review, which I'd appreciate if someone could review, as mingw-python-requests and mingw-python-OWSLib are currently FailsToInst

Re: Review requests

Il 15/02/22 11:15, Sandro Mani ha scritto: > Hi > > I've submitted the two packages which are missing dependencies for review, > which I'd appreciate if someone could review, as mingw-python-requests and > mingw-python-OWSLib are currently FailsToInstall: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla

Re: Review requests: 4x python-flask-* packages

I will review these. – Ben On 12/23/21 05:54, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I have the following packages pending review: python-flask-gravatar - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033804 python-flask-paranoid - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2033803 python-flask-prin

Re: Review requests: four python packages to update mkdocs

Hi I'd still need python-gph-import (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000349) to be reviewed as the last dependency to be able to update mkdocs. Thanks Sandro On 02.09.21 00:51, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd need these four dependencies

Re: Review requests: four python packages to update mkdocs

On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd need these four dependencies reviewed: - python-mkdocs-redirects: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2000347 - python-pyyaml_env_tag: https://

Re: Review requests: four python packages to update mkdocs

On 02.09.21 11:43, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 02. 09. 21 11:33, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 02. 09. 21 11:31, Sandro Mani wrote: On 02.09.21 11:16, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 02. 09. 21 10:14, Sandro Mani wrote: On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi To updat

Re: Review requests: four python packages to update mkdocs

On 02. 09. 21 11:33, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 02. 09. 21 11:31, Sandro Mani wrote: On 02.09.21 11:16, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 02. 09. 21 10:14, Sandro Mani wrote: On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd n

Re: Review requests: four python packages to update mkdocs

On 02. 09. 21 11:31, Sandro Mani wrote: On 02.09.21 11:16, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 02. 09. 21 10:14, Sandro Mani wrote: On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd need these four dependencies reviewed: -

Re: Review requests: four python packages to update mkdocs

On 02.09.21 11:16, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 02. 09. 21 10:14, Sandro Mani wrote: On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd need these four dependencies reviewed: - python-mkdocs-redirects: https://bugzil

Re: Review requests: four python packages to update mkdocs

On 02. 09. 21 10:14, Sandro Mani wrote: Hmm in the case of python-pyyaml_env_tag See also https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_library_naming ...The Fedora package’s name SHOULD contain the Canonical project name. If possible, the project name SHOULD be the

Re: Review requests: four python packages to update mkdocs

On 02. 09. 21 10:14, Sandro Mani wrote: On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd need these four dependencies reviewed: - python-mkdocs-redirects: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20

Re: Review requests: four python packages to update mkdocs

On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd need these four dependencies reviewed: - python-mkdocs-redirects: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2000347 - python-pyyaml_env_tag: https://b

Re: Review requests: four python packages to update mkdocs

On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd need these four dependencies reviewed: - python-mkdocs-redirects: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2000347 - python-pyyaml_env_tag: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

Re: Review requests: perl-Regexp-Pattern-DefHash, mingw-Imath, {mingw-python-}pyephem, mingw-qt6-*

On 31.07.21 14:57, Richard Shaw wrote: On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 6:26 AM Sandro Mani > wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988364 - mingw-Imath: needed to update to mingw-openexr 3.x I

Re: Review requests: perl-Regexp-Pattern-DefHash, mingw-Imath, {mingw-python-}pyephem, mingw-qt6-*

On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 6:26 AM Sandro Mani wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988364 - mingw-Imath: > needed to update to mingw-openexr 3.x > I can take Imath since I'm the non-mingw maintainer as long as you're not in a hurry. I'm still on vacation for a few more days. Than

Re: Review requests: virt-backup & chunkfs

Hau idatzi du Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) erabiltzaileak (2020 abe. 5, lr. (17:47)): > > Two pretty simple review requests. Reviewed & approved ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@li

Re: Review requests: enchant2, mingw-enchant2

On 14.12.2017 11:35, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: - Original Message - From: "Sandro Mani" To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 10:57:22 PM Subject: Review requests: enchant2, mingw-enchant2 Hi I've posted reviews for enchant2 and mingw

Re: Review requests: enchant2, mingw-enchant2

- Original Message - > From: "Sandro Mani" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 10:57:22 PM > Subject: Review requests: enchant2, mingw-enchant2 > > Hi > > I've posted reviews for enchant2 and mingw-enchant2: > > - enchant2: https://

Re: Review requests: perl-Regexp-Pattern, perl-Regexp-Pattern-License

Am 18.08.2017 um 12:35 schrieb Sandro Mani: Hi I needs these simple perl packages reviewed to fix broken dependencies introduced in licensecheck-3.0.31 (the reason it actually built successfully was that licensecheck-3.0.30 actually provided perl(Regexp::Pattern::License), fact which I missed

Re: Review requests that need reviewers

On 11/09/2015 09:19 PM, gil wrote: > Hi Tom, > Taken! > can you take these for me > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995433 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995435 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995444 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258274 > ht

Re: Review requests that need reviewers

Hi Tom, Taken! can you take these for me https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995433 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995435 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995444 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258274 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266805

Re: Review requests: netgen-mesher, tcl-togl

On 12.06.2014 16:29, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 06/11/2014 07:07 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi, For the ongoing effort to package salome/code-aster, I need these two dependencies: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108395 - netgen-mesher

Re: Review requests: netgen-mesher, tcl-togl

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 06/11/2014 07:07 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi, > > For the ongoing effort to package salome/code-aster, I need these > two dependencies: > > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108395 - > netgen-mesher - Somewhat complexish, autotools,

Aw: Re: Review requests for guayadeque-0.3.6-svn1830

Gesendet: Dienstag, 04. September 2012 um 08:18 Uhr Von: "Brendan Jones" An: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Betreff: Re: Review requests for guayadeque-0.3.6-svn1830 On 09/03/2012 01:05 PM, Matthias Runge wrote: > > > > I can take this on and add to the FedoraAudio tra

Re: Review requests for guayadeque-0.3.6-svn1830

On 09/03/2012 01:05 PM, Matthias Runge wrote: Martin Gansser schrieb: Hi all, I've just packaged guayadeque - A Audio player and organizer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853553 Descripition : Guayadeque is a music management program designed for all music enthusiasts. It is F

Re: Review requests for guayadeque-0.3.6-svn1830

Martin Gansser schrieb: >Hi all, > >I've just packaged guayadeque - A Audio player and organizer. >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853553 > >Descripition : Guayadeque is a music management program designed for >all music enthusiasts. >It is Full Featured Linux media player that can

Re: Review requests for tntnet

On 02/07/12 09:38, Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just packaged tntnet - A web application server for web applications. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821224 > tntnet is needed for vdr-live - An interactive web interface for VDR > > can someone review this package ? > Unt

Re: review requests for several R-sub-packages

On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Pierre-Yves wrote: > On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 10:28 +0200, josef radinger wrote: >> >> I prepared a handfull of R-subpackages and would need a reviewer. >> The packages should be rather easy to review, some have dependencies >> to >> other packages from my list. I noted that on

Re: review requests for several R-sub-packages

On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 10:28 +0200, josef radinger wrote: > > I prepared a handfull of R-subpackages and would need a reviewer. > The packages should be rather easy to review, some have dependencies > to > other packages from my list. I noted that on the given > bugzilla-entries. Are-you already