Re: Retiring OpenShift v2 non-client packages from Fedora

2014-10-06 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
On 10/03/2014 10:51 PM, Haïkel wrote: 2014-10-03 22:30 GMT+02:00 Stephen Gallagher : On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 21:43 +0200, Haïkel wrote: This makes sense to me, though it annoys me as a token of our failure to be an attractive platform for such use cases. DId you consider providing a copr repo

Re: Retiring OpenShift v2 non-client packages from Fedora

2014-10-03 Thread Haïkel
2014-10-03 22:30 GMT+02:00 Stephen Gallagher : > > > > On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 21:43 +0200, Haïkel wrote: >> This makes sense to me, though it annoys me as a token of our failure >> to be an attractive platform for such use cases. >> >> DId you consider providing a copr repository ? > > > A COPR repo

Re: Retiring OpenShift v2 non-client packages from Fedora

2014-10-03 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 21:43 +0200, Haïkel wrote: > This makes sense to me, though it annoys me as a token of our failure > to be an attractive platform for such use cases. > > DId you consider providing a copr repository ? A COPR repository probably wouldn't work, because they'd have to provi

Re: Retiring OpenShift v2 non-client packages from Fedora

2014-10-03 Thread Haïkel
This makes sense to me, though it annoys me as a token of our failure to be an attractive platform for such use cases. DId you consider providing a copr repository ? Regards, H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code