On 05/08/20 04:35 +0200, J. Scheurich wrote:
Am 05.08.20 um 01:52 schrieb Ben Cotton:
Here are some upcoming deadlines and milestones for the Fedora 33
development cycle:
Are you sure, that boost1.73 should be part of fedora 33 ?
It lloks like boost.173 would require a future verson of gcc/g+
On 05.08.2020 04:35, J. Scheurich wrote:
> Are you sure, that boost1.73 should be part of fedora 33 ?
It is already part of Fedora 33.
> It lloks like boost.173 would require a future verson of gcc/g++
No. Everything works as required.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
__
* J. Scheurich:
> It lloks like boost.173 would require a future verson of gcc/g++
Why do you think that?
According to Boost upstream, anything later than GCC 8 is untested, but
I don't think this is actually true.
Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing li
Am 05.08.20 um 01:52 schrieb Ben Cotton:
Here are some upcoming deadlines and milestones for the Fedora 33
development cycle:
Are you sure, that boost1.73 should be part of fedora 33 ?
It lloks like boost.173 would require a future verson of gcc/g++
ao long
MUFTI
_
