Re: Rawhide Repo needs downgradeable packages

2020-12-15 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 09. 12. 20 v 0:34 Kevin Kofler via devel napsal(a): That said, will "dnf downgrade" offer you cached versions that are no longer in the repos? Last I checked, it only offered me whatever was still in the repos, and I had to dig up the cached RPMs manually. Yes, right, that is why there w

Re: Rawhide Repo needs downgradeable packages

2020-12-09 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Marius Schwarz wrote: > it will eat disk space. If you have 0ad laying around in 3 different > version, that's 1 GB each. Sure, but that is usually not the scarce resource. And if you need the disk space, you can always clear the cache manually. Deleting data should not be the default action. >

Re: Rawhide Repo needs downgradeable packages

2020-12-09 Thread Marius Schwarz
Am 09.12.20 um 00:34 schrieb Kevin Kofler via devel: Vít Ondruch wrote: As a workaround, if you use `keepcache=True` in dnf.conf, you'd have copies of everything you previously installed on your system. I still don't understand why this is not the default. Even for stable releases, because with

Re: Rawhide Repo needs downgradeable packages

2020-12-08 Thread James Cassell
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020, at 6:34 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Vít Ondruch wrote: > > As a workaround, if you use `keepcache=True` in dnf.conf, you'd have > > copies of everything you previously installed on your system. > > I still don't understand why this is not the default. Even for stable

Re: Rawhide Repo needs downgradeable packages

2020-12-08 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Vít Ondruch wrote: > As a workaround, if you use `keepcache=True` in dnf.conf, you'd have > copies of everything you previously installed on your system. I still don't understand why this is not the default. Even for stable releases, because without it, you can easily obtain only the ancient GA

Re: Rawhide Repo needs downgradeable packages

2020-12-08 Thread Colin Walters
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020, at 11:45 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > I'm wondering, wouldn't this scenario be a prime application of an > OSTree based system like Silverblue? ... On Mon, Dec 7, 2020, at 12:28 PM, Martin Kolman wrote: > With OSTree one could easily have multiple update states availabl

Re: Rawhide Repo needs downgradeable packages

2020-12-07 Thread Marius Schwarz
Am 07.12.20 um 18:28 schrieb Martin Kolman: Nice, very good progress! :) I really need to try the latest Fedora image on my Pinephone when I have some time. :) Read the issue tracker on github before you update... you will be surprised ;) Best regards, Marius Schwarz

Re: Rawhide Repo needs downgradeable packages

2020-12-07 Thread Martin Kolman
On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 16:11 +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > as you may have heared, Fedora is now running on Pinephone and other > devices, that need bleeding edge versions to function. Are bleeding edge of all packages needed ? If not I wonder if just budili

Re: Rawhide Repo needs downgradeable packages

2020-12-07 Thread Martin Kolman
On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 17:45 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 4:12 PM Marius Schwarz wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > as you may have heared, Fedora is now running on Pinephone and other > > devices, that need bleeding edge versions to > > function. > > > > Status of Fedora Pine

Re: Rawhide Repo needs downgradeable packages

2020-12-07 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 4:12 PM Marius Schwarz wrote: > > > Hi, > > as you may have heared, Fedora is now running on Pinephone and other devices, > that need bleeding edge versions to function. > > Status of Fedora Pine as of 15:15 CET > > Cams now working, but app needs rework > Mobile INET worki

Re: Rawhide Repo needs downgradeable packages

2020-12-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 04:11:05PM +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote: > > Hi, > > as you may have heared, Fedora is now running on Pinephone and other > devices, that need bleeding edge versions to function. > > Status of Fedora Pine as of 15:15 CET > > Cams now working, but app needs rework > Mobile

Re: Rawhide Repo needs downgradeable packages

2020-12-04 Thread Marius Schwarz
Am 04.12.20 um 17:34 schrieb Adam Williamson: I don't think there's an easy way to do this, because of how we build stuff. The Rawhide and Branched trees are rsynced over top of the previous content from the most recent successful compose, with metadata pre-built at the compose level. The old thi

Re: Rawhide Repo needs downgradeable packages

2020-12-04 Thread Marius Schwarz
Am 04.12.20 um 16:37 schrieb Vít Ondruch: As a workaround, if you use `keepcache=True` in dnf.conf, you'd have copies of everything you previously installed on your system. Thats even better :) thx, didn't know this. best regards, Marius ___ devel mai

Re: Rawhide Repo needs downgradeable packages

2020-12-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 16:11 +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote: > Hi, > > as you may have heared, Fedora is now running on Pinephone and other > devices, that need bleeding edge versions to function. > > Status of Fedora Pine as of 15:15 CET > > Cams now working, but app needs rework > Mobile INET wor

Re: Rawhide Repo needs downgradeable packages

2020-12-04 Thread Vít Ondruch
I definitely support this. As a workaround, if you use `keepcache=True` in dnf.conf, you'd have copies of everything you previously installed on your system. Now if there was some dnf plugin, which would make repository from the cache, that would be super helpful. I have never found time to

Re: rawhide repo giving me an odd error

2010-03-29 Thread Marc Dionne
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Paul wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've been away from my pc for the last couple of days and have come back >> to find a problem. >> >> When I try to do an update from yum, I'm getting the following error >> >> Error

Re: rawhide repo giving me an odd error

2010-03-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Paul wrote: > Hi, > > I've been away from my pc for the last couple of days and have come back > to find a problem. > > When I try to do an update from yum, I'm getting the following error > > Error: Cannot retrieve metalink for repository: rawhide. Please verify

Re: rawhide repo giving me an odd error

2010-03-29 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 07:23 +0100, Paul wrote: > Oddly, Matt's solution of > > wget -O - \ > 'https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide&arch=i686' > > does work, but it looks like the problem is a crypto one... It's also a yum bug that it doesn't give you a sane error message, an

Re: rawhide repo giving me an odd error

2010-03-28 Thread Paul
Hi, > > Error: Cannot retrieve metalink for repository: rawhide. Please verify > > its path and try again > > To get more info use: URLGRABBER_DEBUG=1 yum check-update This gives me 2010-03-29 07:18:52,993 attempt 1/10: https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide&arch=i686 INFO:url

Re: rawhide repo giving me an odd error

2010-03-28 Thread James Antill
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 00:03 +0100, Paul wrote: > Hi, > > I've been away from my pc for the last couple of days and have come back > to find a problem. > > When I try to do an update from yum, I'm getting the following error > > Error: Cannot retrieve metalink for repository: rawhide. Please veri

Re: rawhide repo giving me an odd error

2010-03-28 Thread Matt Domsch
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:03:05AM +0100, Paul wrote: > Hi, > > I've been away from my pc for the last couple of days and have come back > to find a problem. > > When I try to do an update from yum, I'm getting the following error > > Error: Cannot retrieve metalink for repository: rawhide. Plea

Re: Rawhide repo

2010-02-23 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Saturday 20 February 2010 02:19:47 pm Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 08:17:28PM +, Paul wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Just checked why I've not been able to grab the updates from rawhide and > > it looks like the only fedora.repo files in /etc/yum.repos.d is fedora > > and fedora-te

Re: Rawhide repo

2010-02-20 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 08:17:28PM +, Paul wrote: > Hi, > > Just checked why I've not been able to grab the updates from rawhide and > it looks like the only fedora.repo files in /etc/yum.repos.d is fedora > and fedora-testing. What's happened to the fedora-rawhide.repo files? > > I know thin