Orion Poplawski writes:
> Just a quick note - this discussion belongs on the EPEL mailing list.
Apologies. I don't remember seeing that when I read the instructions to
try to get packages into EPEL. I'll check whether it's there/obvious
when I have a chance.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
Doug Ledford writes:
> There was a changeover in maintainership for this package internally, so
> I'm coming into this issue cold.
Thanks for responding. (I assume that means the Red Hat openmpi
package.) I wasn't expecting to get it sorted out in RHEL, and wanted
to avoid what looks like bein
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 11:14 -0400, Peter Martuccelli wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 14:27 +, Dave Love wrote:
> > The undocumented openmpi and mpich updates in RHEL6.6 have broken binary
> > compatibility and seem to be provoking general rebuilds of things in
> > EPEL. While that may be OK for
On 10/30/2014 08:27 AM, Dave Love wrote:
> The undocumented openmpi and mpich updates in RHEL6.6 have broken binary
> compatibility and seem to be provoking general rebuilds of things in
> EPEL.
Just a quick note - this discussion belongs on the EPEL mailing list.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 14:27 +, Dave Love wrote:
> The undocumented openmpi and mpich updates in RHEL6.6 have broken binary
> compatibility and seem to be provoking general rebuilds of things in
> EPEL. While that may be OK for things that are packaged in EPEL, it at
> best doesn't help with ou
