Le Dim 5 mai 2013 12:30, Alec Leamas a écrit :
> On 05/05/2013 11:40 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>> Are you sure it works well in IE8 at all? Because there are lots of
>> other
>> reasons a modern web site will fail in old ie versions
> Double checking... and you're right, openerp only supports IE
Am 05.05.2013 11:44, schrieb Nicolas Mailhot:
> And XP is out-of-support Microsoft-side. So any company use (that is what
> is being talked about here) is likely to stop soonish
fix your calendar
there where i live we have 2013 and not 2014
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 05/05/2013 11:40 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Dim 5 mai 2013 10:19, Alec Leamas a écrit :
This seems to mean that we force web applications to exclude IE version
8 (and older) clients. As this seems to be a widely used IE version
today, is this really the way to go?
It seems to be a case
Le Dim 5 mai 2013 12:01, Felix Miata a écrit :
> On 2013-05-05 11:44 (GMT+0200) Nicolas Mailhot composed:
>
>> XP is out-of-support Microsoft-side.
>
> For what definition of "out-of-support"?
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/endofsupport.aspx
>
> Considering Fedora release lifetimes, Wi
On 2013-05-05 11:44 (GMT+0200) Nicolas Mailhot composed:
XP is out-of-support Microsoft-side.
For what definition of "out-of-support"?
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/endofsupport.aspx
Considering Fedora release lifetimes, WinXP seems to have abundant life left.
--
"The wise are known
Le Dim 5 mai 2013 11:27, Felix Miata a écrit :
> On 2013-05-05 10:19 (GMT+0200) Alec Leamas composed:
>
>> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
>>> Here is the current status of @font-face ttf/otf support in browsers:
>>> http://caniuse.com/ttf ...
>
>> This seems to mean that we force web applications to exc
Le Dim 5 mai 2013 06:40, T.C. Hollingsworth a écrit :
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
> wrote:
>> I think spot will agree there is no way we'll ever ship a font
>> consisting
>> of company logos, it's trademark hell
>
> We ship *lots* of trademarked logos. In Firefox alone the
Le Dim 5 mai 2013 10:19, Alec Leamas a écrit :
> This seems to mean that we force web applications to exclude IE version
> 8 (and older) clients. As this seems to be a widely used IE version
> today, is this really the way to go?
It seems to be a case of Fedora being first and Microsoft being l
On 2013-05-05 10:19 (GMT+0200) Alec Leamas composed:
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Here is the current status of @font-face ttf/otf support in browsers:
http://caniuse.com/ttf ...
This seems to mean that we force web applications to exclude IE version
8 (and older) clients. As this seems to be a
On 05/03/2013 09:50 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Ven 3 mai 2013 21:06, Alec Leamas a écrit :
Still hesitating a here: if upstream has decided to support the widest
possible set of browsers (including IE): should we really just drop the
formats required by IE? From a user perspective, I don't
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> I think spot will agree there is no way we'll ever ship a font consisting
> of company logos, it's trademark hell
We ship *lots* of trademarked logos. In Firefox alone there are
trademarked logos from Mozilla, Google, Amazon, Yahoo!, Micr
On 05/03/2013 09:50 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
[cut]
I'm truly a font newbie. That said, is there really a meaningful
fallback for a font such as sozial
(https://github.com/adamstac/zocial)? I. e., is there a reasonable
fallback for a Facebook button?
I think spot will agree there is no way we
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 10:15 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot writes:
>
> NM> I don't think selinux will block web server accesses to
> NM> /usr/share/fonts/something, since we deploy webapps in
> NM> /usr/share/something_else, which is pretty much the same namesp
Le Ven 3 mai 2013 21:06, Alec Leamas a écrit :
> Still hesitating a here: if upstream has decided to support the widest
> possible set of browsers (including IE): should we really just drop the
> formats required by IE? From a user perspective, I don't really follow
> this although I do underst
On 05/03/2013 03:51 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Lun 29 avril 2013 11:22, Alec Leamas a écrit :
The reply makes me feel a little more confused, on a higher level. How
does that reply translate to the packaging of a web application with
some bundled webfonts ? "scratching my head".
That means
> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot writes:
NM> I don't think selinux will block web server accesses to
NM> /usr/share/fonts/something, since we deploy webapps in
NM> /usr/share/something_else, which is pretty much the same namespace.
Well, there are a whole lot of specific fcontext entries for conten
Le Ven 3 mai 2013 16:24, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit :
>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot writes:
>
> NM> I'm not convinced at all this needs changing, since mod_alias
> NM> permits mapping of system paths anywhere you want in your URL space.
>
> But selinux probably doesn't, so the issue is slightl
> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot writes:
NM> I'm not convinced at all this needs changing, since mod_alias
NM> permits mapping of system paths anywhere you want in your URL space.
But selinux probably doesn't, so the issue is slightly more complicated.
- J<
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedo
Le Ven 3 mai 2013 14:45, Miroslav Suchý a écrit :
>> Note that in my case the "fonts" are just just images and icons, which
>> makes the normal font fallback mechanisms useless. They are needed,
>> period.
>
> Well it is not defined in policy.
Actually, the current policy forbids fonts anywhere
Le Lun 29 avril 2013 11:22, Alec Leamas a écrit :
> The reply makes me feel a little more confused, on a higher level. How
> does that reply translate to the packaging of a web application with
> some bundled webfonts ? "scratching my head".
That means that you usually do not need a special form
On 04/29/2013 11:22 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
The reply makes me feel a little more confused, on a higher level. How
does that reply translate to the packaging of a web application with
some bundled webfonts ? "scratching my head".
Me too :)
Note that in my case the "fonts" are just just images
On 04/29/2013 11:04 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 04/27/2013 01:49 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
I'm trying to package a web application with bundled fonts. These fonts
are used by the web clients (browsers), and just served from the Fedora
webapp. The case is similar to javascript .js files.
Trying t
On 04/27/2013 01:49 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
I'm trying to package a web application with bundled fonts. These fonts
are used by the web clients (browsers), and just served from the Fedora
webapp. The case is similar to javascript .js files.
Trying to package the webfonts as dependencies I have r
23 matches
Mail list logo
