On 09. 09. 19 10:09, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 09. 09. 19 3:53, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi,
I need to create a multi-package bodhi update for F30 and F31 to fix a bug.
Could a provenpackager help me out please? I only have commit rights to
wxpython.
For F31, please create an update with builds a
On 09. 09. 19 3:53, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi,
I need to create a multi-package bodhi update for F30 and F31 to fix a bug.
Could a provenpackager help me out please? I only have commit rights to wxpython.
For F31, please create an update with builds and tag bug #1739469:
python-fsleyes-0.30.1
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I'm slowly trying to move packages to wxWidgets 3.0 so we can get rid of wx
2.8 which is not maintained since 2011. I have made a bunch of pull
requests but very frustratingly, many of them received no response (and no
response to the bugs I filed). R
On 16.8.2018 01:45, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi,
I'm slowly trying to move packages to wxWidgets 3.0 so we can get rid of
wx 2.8 which is not maintained since 2011. I have made a bunch of pull
requests but very frustratingly, many of them received no response (and
no response to the bugs I filed
On 16.8.2018 04:46, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I'm slowly trying to move packages to wxWidgets 3.0 so we can get rid of
wx 2.8 which is not maintained since 2011. I have made a bunch of pull
requests but very frustratingly, many of them received no response
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I'm slowly trying to move packages to wxWidgets 3.0 so we can get rid of
wx 2.8 which is not maintained since 2011. I have made a bunch of pull
requests but very frustratingly, many of them received no response (and no
response to the bugs I filed). Rat
> I'm slowly trying to move packages to wxWidgets 3.0 so we can get rid of
> wx 2.8 which is not maintained since 2011. I have made a bunch of pull
> requests but very frustratingly, many of them received no response (and no
> response to the bugs I filed). Rather than go through the non-respo
Since nobody replied in ~24h, I went ahead and pushed the green button ;)
It's building now.
Zbyszek
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 09:07:18AM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2017, Vascom wrote:
>
> >I am think for rawhide wxGTK3-devel can be simply removed from spec (not
> >need %if...).B
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017, Vascom wrote:
I am think for rawhide wxGTK3-devel can be simply removed from spec (not
need %if...).Because for old releases it has separate branches.
Yes, that's fine too. It appears, however, that the spec was being
maintained for epel and older fedoras, so I made the
I am think for rawhide wxGTK3-devel can be simply removed from spec (not
need %if...).
Because for old releases it has separate branches.
ср, 18 окт. 2017 г. в 3:31, Scott Talbert :
> The audacity package needs a small change and rebuild in rawhide after I
> merged compat-wxGTK3-gtk2 into wxGTK3.
On 7 August 2014 13:27, Till Maas wrote:
> This is done now.
>
> Thank you!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 11:16:09AM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> On 6 August 2014 23:02, Till Maas wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 05:15:17PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> >
> > > So, I went to orphan the Fedora branches of cmake28 (not sure why these
> > > branches were created in
On Aug 7, 2014 6:16 PM, "Jonathan Underwood"
wrote:
> As I say below, I orphaned the F21, F20, F19 branches on pkgdb. Then I
checked out the F21 branch with fedpkg and tried to run the command below.
Have I misunderstood your question?
Please also retire the master branch(not f21) as well. Or whe
On 6 August 2014 23:02, Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 05:15:17PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>
> > So, I went to orphan the Fedora branches of cmake28 (not sure why these
> > branches were created in the first place - I had meant only to create an
>
> What did you request where?
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 05:15:17PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> So, I went to orphan the Fedora branches of cmake28 (not sure why these
> branches were created in the first place - I had meant only to create an
What did you request where?
> EL6 branch). Anyway, stupidly, I orphaned them in
On 08/06/2014 10:15 AM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
Hi folks,
So, I went to orphan the Fedora branches of cmake28 (not sure why these
branches were created in the first place - I had meant only to create an EL6
branch). Anyway, stupidly, I orphaned them in pkgdb before running fedpkg
retire on the
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Simone Caronni wrote:
> On 11 June 2013 09:31, Simone Caronni wrote:
>>
>> I'm still looking for a fix to the second bug. Any provenpackager willing
>> to help with the second issue?
>
>
> ...or willing to grant me commit access.
>
> Thanks,
> --Simone
>
Didn't
2013-06-03 13:48, Simone Caronni skrev:
> any provenpackager willing to push these 2 fixes? One is really trivial
> and the other one is simply a typo.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883983
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948613
I have fixed the Brasero issue; the 2
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> There are still about half a dozen packages left that failed the recent
> mass rebuild because they contain source-code dependencies on obsolete
> versions of libpng and/or libtiff. I've filed patches to fix them,
> but don't have permissions to
Adam Williamson writes:
> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 01:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> There are still about half a dozen packages left that failed the recent
>> mass rebuild because they contain source-code dependencies on obsolete
>> versions of libpng and/or libtiff. I've filed patches to fix them,
>
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 01:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> There are still about half a dozen packages left that failed the recent
> mass rebuild because they contain source-code dependencies on obsolete
> versions of libpng and/or libtiff. I've filed patches to fix them,
> but don't have permissions to
On 06/23/2011 09:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 20:22 +0400, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
> wrote:
>> To fix [1] and [2] dependency rebuild required.
>> Scratch build successful [3], if someone can help on it, I'm ready
>> commit and push changes in git.
>> Rebuild for
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 20:22 +0400, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
wrote:
> To fix [1] and [2] dependency rebuild required.
> Scratch build successful [3], if someone can help on it, I'm ready
> commit and push changes in git.
> Rebuild for rawhide and f15 required.
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.re
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2011, 13:19 +0200 schrieb Nicola Soranzo:
> razertool package is dead upstream
razercfg [1] it the successor of razertool. If somebody packages it up,
it would be nice to have the package properly obsolete razertool.
Regards,
Christoph
[1] http://bues.ch/cms/hacking/razerc
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 13:19:46 +0200, NS wrote:
> razertool package is dead upstream and has been deprecated by its maintainer
> Andreas Osowski (th0br0). Unfortunately he didn't complete all the steps to
> correctly remove a package:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_e
25 matches
Mail list logo
