Bill Nottingham wrote:
> The feature submisson deadline was never preliminary. The schedule was
> not finalized until after all features were submitted.
But it's clear that there was a misunderstanding there, and that all the
other criteria for an exception are satisfied.
Kevin Kofler
-
Christoph Wickert (christoph.wick...@gmail.com) said:
> 3. The feature submission deadline was poorly communicated. First
> the schedule was only preliminary, then it was finalized, but
> this changed not announced. The announcement about the final
> feature submission
Am Montag, den 11.02.2013, 12:42 -0800 schrieb Toshio Kuratomi:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 04:24:11PM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 11.02.2013, 13:38 + schrieb Jaroslav Reznik:
> > 2. Even if we don't make it, there is absolutely zero impact on the
> > release.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 04:24:11PM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Montag, den 11.02.2013, 13:38 + schrieb Jaroslav Reznik:
> 2. Even if we don't make it, there is absolutely zero impact on the
> release.
based on this, seems like just a set of new packages. I'd be willing t
Am Montag, den 11.02.2013, 13:38 + schrieb Jaroslav Reznik:
> This Feature has been submitted *after* Feature Submission Deadline and
> requires exception from FESCo to be accepted as Fedora 19 Feature.
>
> Owner(s), please, provide motivation why do you think the exception should be
> gran
