Re: Proposal to improve the Sponsorship process on Fedora

2011-01-06 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:36:06PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:31:59 +0100 > Jochen Schmitt wrote: > > > No, I anyone pres the 'add to group' buttoun the mail will be > > sent to all sponsors. Such behaviour is called spaming, because > > I'm really not interessting which p

Re: Proposal to improve the Sponsorship process on Fedora

2011-01-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:31:59 +0100 Jochen Schmitt wrote: > No, I anyone pres the 'add to group' buttoun the mail will be > sent to all sponsors. Such behaviour is called spaming, because > I'm really not interessting which people are sponsors by other > sponsors. Well, in the past that would be

Re: Proposal to improve the Sponsorship process on Fedora

2011-01-06 Thread Jochen Schmitt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:33:46 -0600, you wrote: >Well, nobody can apply to the packager group; it is invite-only. There >may be a few people in the sponsorship queue from before the invite-only >functionality was implemented. Yes, when I logon on FAS

Re: Proposal to improve the Sponsorship process on Fedora

2011-01-05 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "JS" == Jochen Schmitt writes: JS> because I have read, that new contributors should not applies JS> membership on the packagers group and the sponsor should invites JS> them to this group, Well, nobody can apply to the packager group; it is invite-only. There may be a few people in the s