Re: Problems in packaging kicad

2010-03-17 Thread Tom "spot" Callaway
On 03/17/2010 12:56 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: >> - link fixes. Really, these libraries should be linked properly so they >> don't need the executable linking calls to be explicitly correct, but >> cmake gives me a headache. > > You can use target_link_libraries on a shar

Re: Problems in packaging kicad

2010-03-17 Thread Alain Portal
Le Mercredi 17 Mars 2010 10:19:52, Terry Barnaby a écrit : > Another little change that is needed is that the package source file > "kicad-ld.conf" has the contents "/usr/lib64/kicad". It should be > "/usr/lib/kicad", otherwise it does not work correctly on 32bit > i686 platforms. > > The kicad.s

Re: Problems in packaging kicad

2010-03-17 Thread Alain Portal
Le Mardi 16 Mars 2010 21:19:44, Tom "spot" Callaway a écrit : > On 03/16/2010 08:27 AM, Alain Portal wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I get some problem in packaging kicad. > > Linking fails, and I don't know how to solve. > > There is no problem if I compile without packaging. > > Well, I doubt that serio

Re: Problems in packaging kicad

2010-03-17 Thread Terry Barnaby
On 03/16/2010 08:19 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On 03/16/2010 08:27 AM, Alain Portal wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I get some problem in packaging kicad. >> Linking fails, and I don't know how to solve. >> There is no problem if I compile without packaging. > > Well, I doubt that seriously. This code i

Re: Problems in packaging kicad

2010-03-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > - link fixes. Really, these libraries should be linked properly so they > don't need the executable linking calls to be explicitly correct, but > cmake gives me a headache. You can use target_link_libraries on a shared library just as well as on an executable.

Re: Problems in packaging kicad

2010-03-16 Thread Tom "spot" Callaway
On 03/16/2010 08:27 AM, Alain Portal wrote: > Hi, > > I get some problem in packaging kicad. > Linking fails, and I don't know how to solve. > There is no problem if I compile without packaging. Well, I doubt that seriously. This code is a bit of a mess (but still not as painful as chromium). At