On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 09:56 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> > I cannot reproduce these numbers on our testing machine - in [1] power
> > consumption in active idle is +- measurement error, in other tests
> > it is mostly higher power consumption, but also higher perfo
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 06:35 -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks all who attended the Power Management Test day, the feedback was
> really great. Stats follows
>
> thanks & regards
>
> Jaroslav
Big thanks for doing all the organization and publicity for this, sorry
we couldn't help
Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> I cannot reproduce these numbers on our testing machine - in [1] power
> consumption in active idle is +- measurement error, in other tests
> it is mostly higher power consumption, but also higher performance.
> Similar for idle graph in [2]. I will try to get one of the
- Original Message -
> Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> > thanks all who attended the Power Management Test day, the feedback
> > was
> > really great. Stats follows
>
> On the topic of power management:
>
> Is there anything being done to address the regressions[1] in 2.6.38+
> kernels?
>
I c
Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> thanks all who attended the Power Management Test day, the feedback was
> really great. Stats follows
On the topic of power management:
Is there anything being done to address the regressions[1] in 2.6.38+
kernels?
[1] http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&ite
