Dne 15.2.2017 v 16:39 Colin Walters napsal(a):
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> First of all, I am still not fond of moving the plugins.json into /usr.
> Why is that? It's like the fontconfig one, which was discussed in FESCo:
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1635#comm
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> First of all, I am still not fond of moving the plugins.json into /usr.
Why is that? It's like the fontconfig one, which was discussed in FESCo:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1635#comment-51133
and approved:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/16
Hi Colin,
First of all, I am still not fond of moving the plugins.json into /usr.
Nevertheless, with the proposed Vagrant 1.9.1 package, things are
different then they used to be. Up to now, we were re-configuring
Vagrant to search for the plugins.json in /var/lib/vagrant. But this is
not easily
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017, at 08:14 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> 3) The downside of (1) is that the plugin registration scripts are baked
> into vagrant plugins, I had to apply some hacks to keep the backward
> compatibility with Vagrant plugins currently in Fedora.
While you're working on this, can you
