First of all sorry if i looks like rude on my answers, was not the
intention.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Monday, August 8, 2016 10:36:11 AM CDT Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
> > Not works.
>
> I do not understand what does not work
>
> > You need then talk with
On Monday, August 8, 2016 10:36:11 AM CDT Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
> Not works.
I do not understand what does not work
> You need then talk with the requester and then decide to deny or not.
> And if he tries again, do the process again.
> What you can' t do is letting anyone waiting or m
Not works.
You need then talk with the requester and then decide to deny or not.
And if he tries again, do the process again.
What you can' t do is letting anyone waiting or making the package hostage.
About the notifications, yes, everyone get notifications if set your email
properly or use @fed
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 07:35:04PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 08/06/2016 05:36 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 03:48:36PM +0100, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 08:41:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>> Your email needs a "call to a
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 09:45:57AM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, wrote:
> > Sometimes a maintainer doesn't want to approve ACLs for "reasons" but
> > doesn't want to reject the request for various reasons including the
> > requestor re-request of denied re
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, wrote:
> Sometimes a maintainer doesn't want to approve ACLs for "reasons" but
> doesn't want to reject the request for various reasons including the
> requestor re-request of denied requests.
>
To add few things here,
1) Why do we need such "Pending ACLs"
On 08/06/2016 05:36 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 03:48:36PM +0100, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 08:41:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know
>>> what they are supposed to
Sometimes a maintainer doesn't want to approve ACLs for "reasons" but doesn't
want to reject the request for various reasons including the requestor
re-request of denied requests.
Dennis
On August 5, 2016 3:34:58 PM GMT+02:00, Helio Chissini de Castro
wrote:
>I have a strong opinion over thi
On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 17:23:31 +0100
Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 04:36:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I've checked again just now, and I still don't see those ACLs.
>
> My guess is that it's a PkgDB bug and for this reason I'm trying to
> get in touch with
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 10:26:36AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:34:58PM +0200, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
> >> I have a strong opinion over this
> >>
> >> All the ACL's should be accepted, doesn't m
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 04:36:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I've checked again just now, and I still don't see those ACLs.
My guess is that it's a PkgDB bug and for this reason I'm trying to get
in touch with Pingou.
Cheers,
Fale
--
Fabio Alessandro Locati
Red Hat - Senior Consultant
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 03:48:36PM +0100, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 08:41:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know
> > what they are supposed to do about it. In this case it's probably:
> >
> >
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 08:41:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know
> what they are supposed to do about it. In this case it's probably:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/pending/
>
> However I visited the above
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:34:58PM +0200, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
>> I have a strong opinion over this
>>
>> All the ACL's should be accepted, doesn't matter the level.
>> And why i think of this ?
>>
>> Two simple reasons:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:34:58PM +0200, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
> I have a strong opinion over this
>
> All the ACL's should be accepted, doesn't matter the level.
> And why i think of this ?
>
> Two simple reasons:
> - The packager abandoned the package, because several reasons, and th
I have a strong opinion over this
All the ACL's should be accepted, doesn't matter the level.
And why i think of this ?
Two simple reasons:
- The packager abandoned the package, because several reasons, and then is
far away from Fedora systems for some time
- The packager is actively using Fedora
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:14:02AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 20:41:56 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> > Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know
> > what they are supposed to do about it. In this case it's probably:
> >
> > https://admin.fed
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:14:02AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 20:41:56 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:43:40PM +0200, Fabio Alessandro Locati
> > wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This morning, during the automation workshop, I had the occasi
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 20:41:56 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:43:40PM +0200, Fabio Alessandro Locati
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This morning, during the automation workshop, I had the occasion of
> > speaking about this with Pingou and Threebean.
> > Thanks to Ping
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:43:40PM +0200, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This morning, during the automation workshop, I had the occasion of
> speaking about this with Pingou and Threebean.
> Thanks to Pingou hints, I've created a query to get pending ACL from
> pkgdb.
> What I'd lik
20 matches
Mail list logo
