Re: Review swap: python-graph-tool (Was: Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build)

2019-10-21 Thread Ben Cotton
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019, 03:32 Ankur Sinha wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763597 > I'll trade you for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763261 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Review swap: python-graph-tool (Was: Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build)

2019-10-21 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hello, It finally built, and I have a review up here if anyone would like to swap reviews: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763597 Thanks for your help, everyone, -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zo

Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build

2019-10-15 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 14:17:50 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:48 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > One option is to roll the dice with -j2 and hope you get one of the nice > builders. May be quicker overall to risk a OOM failure on a build or two until > you get a good builder

Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build

2019-10-15 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:48 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 11:14:42 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I was doing good until I hit this one, went through all 8GB of swap... > > > > g++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus > > compilation terminated. > > make[4]: ***

Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build

2019-10-15 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 11:14:42 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > I was doing good until I hit this one, went through all 8GB of swap... > > g++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus > compilation terminated. > make[4]: *** [Makefile:598: graph_community_network_eavg_imp1.lo] Error 1 > m

Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build

2019-10-15 Thread Richard Shaw
I was doing good until I hit this one, went through all 8GB of swap... g++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus compilation terminated. make[4]: *** [Makefile:598: graph_community_network_eavg_imp1.lo] Error 1 make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs Thanks, Richard

Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build

2019-10-15 Thread Richard Shaw
Out of curiosity I tried a build with "-l3" for load limiting but I still got a OOM situation on my Ryzen 5 2600 w/ 16GB of memory. Trying again with -j3 (since -l doesn't monitor memory) and so far so good! Since I'm running the build remotely from my work laptop I'm monitoring my home workstati

Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build

2019-10-15 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 17:23:09 +0200, Christopher Engelhard wrote: > On 14.10.19 23:07, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Out of curiosity, how long did the build take on your machine there? > > Almost 3 hours. Woah--that was quick! Was this with all the rpm compiler flags? The Koji scratch build has been ru

Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build

2019-10-15 Thread Christopher Engelhard
On 14.10.19 23:07, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Out of curiosity, how long did the build take on your machine there? Almost 3 hours. Christopher ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproj

Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build

2019-10-15 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 15. 10. 19 v 12:47 Ankur Sinha napsal(a): Maybe I'll try with -j2 or -j3 Personally, I find --load-average=LOAD (-l3) more suitable. It can spin up more threads if they do not create load, or can dynamically fallback to single process if there is high utilization of system. -- Miroslav S

Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build

2019-10-15 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 12:05:57 +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:50:31 +0100 > Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I'm working on packaging up graph-tool[1] for SciTech/NeuroFedora. The > > spec file is a WIP here[2]. I've not yet managed to complete a > > build---it managed t

Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build

2019-10-15 Thread Dan Horák
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:50:31 +0100 Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working on packaging up graph-tool[1] for SciTech/NeuroFedora. The > spec file is a WIP here[2]. I've not yet managed to complete a > build---it managed to get my F31 server machine to go completely > unresponsive when I had

Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build

2019-10-15 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 14. 10. 19 v 17:50 Ankur Sinha napsal(a): Hello, I'm working on packaging up graph-tool[1] for SciTech/NeuroFedora. The spec file is a WIP here[2]. I've not yet managed to complete a build---it managed to get my F31 server machine to go completely unresponsive when I had tried last evening-

Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build

2019-10-14 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 21:02:49 +0200, Christopher Engelhard wrote: > Hi, Hello, > On 14.10.19 19:59, Ankur Sinha wrote: > >> Is the documentation using parallel builds? > > > > They don't say. > > Seems unlikely, see below > > > It uses configure/make/make install. I had run the build with make

Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build

2019-10-14 Thread Christopher Engelhard
Hi, On 14.10.19 19:59, Ankur Sinha wrote: >> Is the documentation using parallel builds? > > They don't say. Seems unlikely, see below > It uses configure/make/make install. I had run the build with make -j1 > too, but that had seemed to run even slower.. I hadn't checked the > resource usage t

Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build

2019-10-14 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 10:54:40 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:51 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm working on packaging up graph-tool[1] for SciTech/NeuroFedora. The > spec file is a WIP here[2].  I've not yet managed to complete a > build---it mana