Re: Packages requiring Xorg "BackingStore" "true"

2013-09-12 Thread Sandro Mani
On 12.09.2013 16:41, Adam Jackson wrote: On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 23:27 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: Well, yes, but it ought to work regardless of the xorg.conf setting, because that setting has been effectively hardwired to true for about six years now. I rewrote the backing store implementation to

Re: Packages requiring Xorg "BackingStore" "true"

2013-09-12 Thread Sandro Mani
On 12.09.2013 21:30, Przemek Klosowski wrote: On 09/11/2013 05:27 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: Well, yes, but it ought to work regardless of the xorg.conf setting, because that setting has been effectively hardwired to true for about six years now. I rewrote the backing store implementation to use

Re: Packages requiring Xorg "BackingStore" "true"

2013-09-12 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 09/11/2013 05:27 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: Well, yes, but it ought to work regardless of the xorg.conf setting, because that setting has been effectively hardwired to true for about six years now. I rewrote the backing store implementation to use Composite internally, which is always available

Re: Packages requiring Xorg "BackingStore" "true"

2013-09-12 Thread Adam Jackson
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 23:27 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > Well, yes, but it ought to work regardless of the xorg.conf setting, > > because that setting has been effectively hardwired to true for about > > six years now. I rewrote the backing store implementation to use > > Composite internally, wh

Re: Packages requiring Xorg "BackingStore" "true"

2013-09-11 Thread Sandro Mani
Well, yes, but it ought to work regardless of the xorg.conf setting, because that setting has been effectively hardwired to true for about six years now. I rewrote the backing store implementation to use Composite internally, which is always available, so we just blindly ignore the config setti

Re: Packages requiring Xorg "BackingStore" "true"

2013-09-11 Thread Adam Jackson
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 12:32 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > On ons, 2013-09-11 at 12:16 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Some time ago I've packaged Xfoil, Avl and Xrotor (which are popular > > codes for foil/fluid-dynamics related computations), but I never ended > > up posting a

Re: Packages requiring Xorg "BackingStore" "true"

2013-09-11 Thread Sandro Mani
On 11.09.2013 13:22, Florian Weimer wrote: On 09/11/2013 01:07 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: Thanks for you quick reply, unfortunately the replot function is defined nowhere. Oooh. Perhaps try calling GWXFLUSH(), then? That should restore the window contents from the stored pixmap. It won't wor

Re: Packages requiring Xorg "BackingStore" "true"

2013-09-11 Thread Florian Weimer
On 09/11/2013 01:07 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: Thanks for you quick reply, unfortunately the replot function is defined nowhere. Oooh. Perhaps try calling GWXFLUSH(), then? That should restore the window contents from the stored pixmap. It won't work if client code ever calls GWXDRAWTOWINDOW(

Re: Packages requiring Xorg "BackingStore" "true"

2013-09-11 Thread Sandro Mani
On 11.09.2013 12:21, Florian Weimer wrote: On 09/11/2013 12:16 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: - Question for anyone with Xorg knowledge: how feasible is it to patch out of the plot window code the need for BackingStore? I.e. does it only require some minor changes to the Xlib calls? For reference, th

Re: Packages requiring Xorg "BackingStore" "true"

2013-09-11 Thread Alexander Larsson
On ons, 2013-09-11 at 12:16 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hello, > > Some time ago I've packaged Xfoil, Avl and Xrotor (which are popular > codes for foil/fluid-dynamics related computations), but I never ended > up posting a package review for one reason: the plot window of those > programs need

Re: Packages requiring Xorg "BackingStore" "true"

2013-09-11 Thread Florian Weimer
On 09/11/2013 12:16 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: - Question for anyone with Xorg knowledge: how feasible is it to patch out of the plot window code the need for BackingStore? I.e. does it only require some minor changes to the Xlib calls? For reference, the code is here: [1] > [1] http://smani.fedora