On Tue, Mar 9, 2021, at 10:02 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 7:46 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On 09.03.2021 00:10, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > > Is there something I can do to sed out the -qt5 suffix, or should I
> > > just bite the bullet, build the u
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 7:46 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 09.03.2021 00:10, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > Is there something I can do to sed out the -qt5 suffix, or should I
> > just bite the bullet, build the update and wait for the bug reports to
> > come in?
>
> You cannot modify
On 3/9/21 4:21 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
Do all of the DEs we have in Fedora support the same notification mechanisms?
I'm not 100% sure, but it's freedesktop.org/D-Bus based, so it's about
as standard as it gets these days. (Probably irrelevant, though.)
I added
ln -sf %{_libdir}/%{na
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 10:27 PM Ian Pilcher wrote:
>
> On 3/9/21 1:39 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > Well, the first option is still a no-no, as the fixup has to happen in
> > the user's home directory. For the second one, I think I'd need to add
> > something like "Requires: zenity", which i
On 3/9/21 1:39 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
Well, the first option is still a no-no, as the fixup has to happen in
the user's home directory. For the second one, I think I'd need to add
something like "Requires: zenity", which in turn would pull in other
dependencies.
I don't believe that it
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 7:28 PM Ian Pilcher wrote:
>
> On 3/8/21 5:10 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > Is there something I can do to sed out the -qt5 suffix, or should I
> > just bite the bullet, build the update and wait for the bug reports to
> > come in?
>
> You could replace the executable
On 3/8/21 5:10 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
Is there something I can do to sed out the -qt5 suffix, or should I
just bite the bullet, build the update and wait for the bug reports to
come in?
You could replace the executable with a wrapper script that performs the
necessary fixups before cal
On 09.03.2021 00:10, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
Is there something I can do to sed out the -qt5 suffix, or should I
just bite the bullet, build the update and wait for the bug reports to
come in?
You cannot modify files in user home directories.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycodi
Hi Kevin,
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 1:26 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 01:03:05AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > I don't think that packagers should *ever* be in the business of
> > modifying the content of users' $HOME directories.
>
> In fact this has happened before in
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 01:03:05AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> I don't think that packagers should *ever* be in the business of
> modifying the content of users' $HOME directories.
In fact this has happened before in the past, leading to:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guid
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 12:10 AM Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Upstream has just released a bugfix update for Molsketch and it's the
> kind of update that can't wait for the next fedora release. Among the
> other fixes, the new version has dropped support for
Hello Fabio,
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 1:03 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 12:10 AM Alexander Ploumistos
> wrote:
> >
> > Upstream has just released a bugfix update for Molsketch and it's the
> > kind of update that can't wait for the next fedora release. Among the
> > other f
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 12:10 AM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Upstream has just released a bugfix update for Molsketch and it's the
> kind of update that can't wait for the next fedora release. Among the
> other fixes, the new version has dropped support for Qt4 and with it,
> the -qt
13 matches
Mail list logo
