Re: Package Tutorial bug - missing BuildRequires gcc

2023-03-09 Thread Otto Liljalaakso
Kenneth Goldman kirjoitti 8.3.2023 klo 0.58: -Original Message- From: Jason Tibbitts Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 6:51 PM To: Kenneth Goldman Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Package Tutorial bug - missing BuildRequires gcc Kenneth Goldman

RE: Package Tutorial bug - missing BuildRequires gcc

2023-03-07 Thread Kenneth Goldman
> -Original Message- > From: Jason Tibbitts > Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 6:51 PM > To: Kenneth Goldman > Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Package Tutorial bug - missing BuildRequires gcc > > >>>>> Kenne

Re: Package Tutorial bug - missing BuildRequires gcc

2023-03-02 Thread Otto Liljalaakso
Kenneth Goldman kirjoitti 1.3.2023 klo 22.35: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Packaging_Tutorial_ GNU_Hello/ The tutorial says: Lines which are not needed (e.g. BuildRequires and Requires) can be commented out with the hash # for now. However, I believe that this line

Re: Package Tutorial bug - missing BuildRequires gcc

2023-03-02 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 02. 03. 23 v 0:50 Jason Tibbitts napsal(a): I do see that the license tag should probably have an SPDX identifier "GPL-3.0-or-later" instead of "GPLv3+" but that's somewhat minor. Fair enough. https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/package-maintainer-docs/pull-request/114 Miroslav

Re: Package Tutorial bug - missing BuildRequires gcc

2023-03-01 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 01/03/2023 21:35, Kenneth Goldman wrote: However, I believe that this line is needed. I'm new so perhaps I'm missing something. BuildRequires: gcc See the next step: Additional build tools are defined by adding BuildRequires: rows to the specfile. In Fedora, GCC is the standard compiler

Re: Package Tutorial bug - missing BuildRequires gcc

2023-03-01 Thread Jason Tibbitts
> Kenneth Goldman writes: > but … if the tutorial has a sample .spec file, I think it would > help the new user if it was 100% complete. I believe that the section "A Complete hello.spec File" at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Packaging_Tutorial_GNU_Hello/#_a_comple

RE: Package Tutorial bug - missing BuildRequires gcc

2023-03-01 Thread Kenneth Goldman
Yes, but … if the tutorial has a sample .spec file, I think it would help the new user if it was 100% complete. From: Elliott Sales de Andrade Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 3:38 PM To: Development discussions related to Fedora Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Package Tutorial bug - missing

Re: Package Tutorial bug - missing BuildRequires gcc

2023-03-01 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:35 PM Kenneth Goldman wrote: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Packaging_Tutorial_ > GNU_Hello/ > > > The tutorial says: > > Lines which are not needed (e.g