Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-31 Thread Adam Jackson
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 22:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > (Is it actually impossible for the vesa driver to work after > KMS has kicked in, btw, or is it just something that doesn't work at > present?) Right now, it may work or it may not. Typically the vesa bios assumes it's the only thing th

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 23:02 +0200, François Cami wrote: > >> Also, an RFE: X should back out and use VESA if the auto-detected, or > >> configured, driver fails after 3 attempts instead of attempting to start > >> 30 times and failing 30 times. A desktop notification should be > >> triggered that

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-29 Thread François Cami
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 13:32 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> Kevin Kofler wrote: >> > 3. What if you can't bring up X in the first place? (You can't run gnome- >> > display-properties if you can't get into X. system-config-display >> >

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-29 Thread Matej Cepl
Kevin Kofler, Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:19:51 +0200: >> I believe KDE should have something equivalent ... don't you have a >> tool for managing multiple screens/heads? > > It doesn't do systemwide/permanent settings. (But I think the GNOME tool > also doesn't implement that at this time.) Oh sorry, no

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-29 Thread drago01
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Matej Cepl wrote: >> I believe KDE should have something equivalent ... don't you have a tool >> for managing multiple screens/heads? > > It doesn't do systemwide/permanent settings. (But I think the GNOME tool > also doesn't implement that at

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-28 Thread Kevin Kofler
Matej Cepl wrote: > I believe KDE should have something equivalent ... don't you have a tool > for managing multiple screens/heads? It doesn't do systemwide/permanent settings. (But I think the GNOME tool also doesn't implement that at this time.) Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list dev

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-27 Thread Matej Cepl
Kevin Kofler, Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:59:00 +0200: > 1. Not everyone uses GNOME. I believe KDE should have something equivalent ... don't you have a tool for managing multiple screens/heads? > 3. What if you can't bring up X in the first place? Somebody suggested Xorg -configure but the main point

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 05:28:31PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > system-config-display depends on gtk, so it's all a matter of degree. > > No, I would never mention Gtk as a dep. So, like I said, it's a matter of degree. This is all

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Arthur Pemberton
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 03:59:06PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: >> > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> >> 1. Not everyone uses GNOME. >> > >> > Demonstrably

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 15:59 -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Adam Jackson wrote: > >> > Static configuration should be something you can do from the dynamic > >> > configuration too

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 03:59:06PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> 1. Not everyone uses GNOME. > > > > Demonstrably true, but I don't see how it's relevant. > > You suggested `gno

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Arthur Pemberton
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Adam Jackson wrote: >> > Static configuration should be something you can do from the dynamic >> > configuration tool.  gnome-display-properties should have a "set as >> > default" butt

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Jackson wrote: > > Static configuration should be something you can do from the dynamic > > configuration tool. gnome-display-properties should have a "set as > > default" button. > > Uh… > 1. Not everyone uses GNOME. Demonstrably tru

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:20:23PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > 3. What if you can't bring up X in the first place? > > > > That's an X bug. File a bug. > > I wonder how usable Bugzilla is in Lynx with 80×25 characters. Works absolutely f

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Björn Persson
Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Kevin Kofler wrote: > > 3. What if you can't bring up X in the first place? > > That's an X bug. File a bug. I wonder how usable Bugzilla is in Lynx with 80×25 characters. Björn Persson signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- devel m

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Kevin Kofler
Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Also, an RFE: X should back out and use VESA if the auto-detected, or > configured, driver fails after 3 attempts instead of attempting to start > 30 times and failing 30 times. A desktop notification should be > triggered that says "Hey! X failed and you're using a bas

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 20:27 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> 2. What about systemwide settings? (system-config-display did those.) > > > > What system wide settings? > > The settings in xorg.conf which apply to all users. Presumably, a "make > default" button would be per use

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 13:32 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Kevin Kofler wrote: > > 3. What if you can't bring up X in the first place? (You can't run gnome- > > display-properties if you can't get into X. system-config-display --reconfig > > was a way to fix such problems.) > > That's an X bu

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:59 +0200 > Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Adam Jackson wrote: >> > Static configuration should be something you can do from the dynamic >> > configuration tool.  gnome-display-properties should have a "set as >> > default" butto

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Kevin Kofler wrote: > 3. What if you can't bring up X in the first place? (You can't run gnome- > display-properties if you can't get into X. system-config-display --reconfig > was a way to fix such problems.) That's an X bug. File a bug. Also, an RFE: X should back out and use VESA if the auto-d

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 10:59 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 01:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > On 08/26/2010 01:22 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > I don't have time for it, and I think it's fundamentally misguided. If > > > someone else feels like owning it, go wild. > > > > >

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Kevin Kofler
Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> 2. What about systemwide settings? (system-config-display did those.) > > What system wide settings? The settings in xorg.conf which apply to all users. Presumably, a "make default" button would be per user. Or would it be for the systemwide xorg.conf? Personally, I'd find

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:59 +0200 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Jackson wrote: > > Static configuration should be something you can do from the dynamic > > configuration tool. gnome-display-properties should have a "set as > > default" button. > > Uh… > 1. Not everyone uses GNOME. Very true. I woul

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Jackson wrote: > Static configuration should be something you can do from the dynamic > configuration tool. gnome-display-properties should have a "set as > default" button. Uh… 1. Not everyone uses GNOME. 2. What about systemwide settings? (system-config-display did those.) 3. What if you c

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 01:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 08/26/2010 01:22 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > I don't have time for it, and I think it's fundamentally misguided. If > > someone else feels like owning it, go wild. > > > > This will probably also require access to the upstream repo, so,

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-25 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/26/2010 01:22 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > I don't have time for it, and I think it's fundamentally misguided. If > someone else feels like owning it, go wild. > > This will probably also require access to the upstream repo, so, do > speak up if you take it so we can sort that out. Assuming n