On 14. 03. 19 12:50, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 03. 19 12:33, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Thursday, 14 March 2019 at 10:06, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 03. 19 7:51, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
[...]
Maybe what we need is to have koji for example refusing epoch bumps
(and thus failing
On 14. 03. 19 12:33, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Thursday, 14 March 2019 at 10:06, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 03. 19 7:51, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
[...]
Maybe what we need is to have koji for example refusing epoch bumps
(and thus failing the build) if _not bumping_ epoch would _
On Thursday, 14 March 2019 at 10:06, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 14. 03. 19 7:51, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
[...]
> > Maybe what we need is to have koji for example refusing epoch bumps
> > (and thus failing the build) if _not bumping_ epoch would _not break_
> > the upgrade path to ensure that epoch i
On 14. 03. 19 7:51, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 9:08 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
The epoch was inadvertently bumped (not by me) when ceph was rebased to 14.x in
f30/rawhide.
It just occurred to me that this was a normal update when epoch was
increased, right?
Maybe what we
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 9:08 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> The epoch was inadvertently bumped (not by me) when ceph was rebased to 14.x
> in f30/rawhide.
It just occurred to me that this was a normal update when epoch was
increased, right?
Maybe what we need is to have koji for example refusing e
> All that's broken is a 3rd party's assumption that their Epoch setting
> is greater than Fedora's. Assuming Ceph want to keep using Epoch in
> this way, upstream can simply bump their Epoch again to be greater than
> Fedora's new Epoch.
Or bump their Epoch to something much less likely to confli
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:29:52AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 7:35 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
>
> > The ability to have multiple different builds of the same software which
> > users can choose between, sounds alot like the use case for modularity.
> > Abusing Epoc
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 7:35 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> The ability to have multiple different builds of the same software which
> users can choose between, sounds alot like the use case for modularity.
> Abusing Epoch to try to address this kind of situation feels like a pretty
> undesirable
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 9:12 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 8:22 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> Heck, the spec file
>> that is in Fedora is basically an openSUSE spec with Fedora
>> conditionals in it.
>
>
> The ceph.spec file in Fedora is based on the upstream ceph.spec.in
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 8:22 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> Heck, the spec file
> that is in Fedora is basically an openSUSE spec with Fedora
> conditionals in it.
>
The ceph.spec file in Fedora is based on the upstream ceph.spec.in file;
not on anything in/from openSUSE.
The upstream ceph.spec.in fil
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 7:35 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 03:07:09PM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > The epoch was inadvertently bumped (not by me) when ceph was rebased to
> > 14.x in f30/rawhide.
> >
> > I reset it to 1 in subsequent builds. Now adamwill is running b
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 03:07:09PM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> The epoch was inadvertently bumped (not by me) when ceph was rebased to
> 14.x in f30/rawhide.
>
> I reset it to 1 in subsequent builds. Now adamwill is running builds with
> it bumped to 2 again.
>
> I would prefer that it not be
On Fri, 2019-03-08 at 15:07 -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> The epoch was inadvertently bumped (not by me) when ceph was rebased to
> 14.x in f30/rawhide.
>
> I reset it to 1 in subsequent builds. Now adamwill is running builds with
> it bumped to 2 again.
>
> I would prefer that it not be bumped.
On 08. 03. 19 21:16, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 3:08 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
The epoch was inadvertently bumped (not by me) when ceph was rebased to 14.x in
f30/rawhide.
I reset it to 1 in subsequent builds. Now adamwill is running builds with it
bumped to 2 again.
I would p
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 3:08 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> The epoch was inadvertently bumped (not by me) when ceph was rebased to 14.x
> in f30/rawhide.
>
> I reset it to 1 in subsequent builds. Now adamwill is running builds with it
> bumped to 2 again.
>
> I would prefer that it not be bumped.
15 matches
Mail list logo
