On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:28:55 +0200
Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Montag, den 29.07.2013, 16:37 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > On Sun, 28.07.13 13:24, Christoph Wickert
> > (christoph.wick...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> > > and by pcmamfm and thunar for
> > > handling permissions of removable
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:02 AM, Johannes Lips wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>>
>> BOn Tue, 30.07.13 16:14, Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 23:03 +0200, Lars Seipel wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 04:28:55PM +0200,
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> BOn Tue, 30.07.13 16:14, Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 23:03 +0200, Lars Seipel wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 04:28:55PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > > > thunar and pcmanfm are file mana
On Tue, 30.07.13 16:28, Christoph Wickert (christoph.wick...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Am Montag, den 29.07.2013, 16:37 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > On Sun, 28.07.13 13:24, Christoph Wickert (christoph.wick...@gmail.com)
> > wrote:
> >
> > > and by pcmamfm and thunar for
> > > handling permis
BOn Tue, 30.07.13 16:14, Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 23:03 +0200, Lars Seipel wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 04:28:55PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > > thunar and pcmanfm are file managers and require ConsoleKit for handling
> > > removable storage.
> >
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 23:03 +0200, Lars Seipel wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 04:28:55PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > thunar and pcmanfm are file managers and require ConsoleKit for handling
> > removable storage.
>
> Are you sure you aren't confusing this with something? HAL maybe?
The
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 04:28:55PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> thunar and pcmanfm are file managers and require ConsoleKit for handling
> removable storage.
Are you sure you aren't confusing this with something? HAL maybe?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
Am Montag, den 29.07.2013, 16:37 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> On Sun, 28.07.13 13:24, Christoph Wickert (christoph.wick...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > and by pcmamfm and thunar for
> > handling permissions of removable devices.
>
> I don't know what "pcmamfm" and "thunar" are, but why would th
On Sun, 28.07.13 13:24, Christoph Wickert (christoph.wick...@gmail.com) wrote:
> and by pcmamfm and thunar for
> handling permissions of removable devices.
I don't know what "pcmamfm" and "thunar" are, but why would they use
ConsoleKit for that? Can you elaborate?
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 01:24:55PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Others are not. I am pretty sure ConsoleKit is still needed by LXDM and
> slim as they don't support systemd-logind and by pcmamfm and thunar for
> handling permissions of removable devices.
Slim doesn't require ConsoleKit anymor
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Christoph Wickert
wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 28.07.2013, 04:03 -0700 schrieb Dan Mashal:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After discussion on #fedora-devel, my MATE co-maintainer raveit65,
>> Kalev, Misc, and previous conversations with Rex, I am ready to retire
>> ConsoleKit.
>
> Other
Am Sonntag, den 28.07.2013, 04:03 -0700 schrieb Dan Mashal:
> Hi,
>
> After discussion on #fedora-devel, my MATE co-maintainer raveit65,
> Kalev, Misc, and previous conversations with Rex, I am ready to retire
> ConsoleKit.
Others are not. I am pretty sure ConsoleKit is still needed by LXDM and
s
12 matches
Mail list logo