Re: Obsolete packages still included in Fedora 19 development

2013-02-24 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, 21 Feb, 2013 at 21:24:29 GMT, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Obsolete ('metapost-metauml', 'noarch', '0', '0.2.5', '11.fc19') Retired. Part of texlive now. --Ben -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Obsolete packages still included in Fedora 19 development

2013-02-23 Thread Denis Arnaud
I made apologises elsewhere... so I repeat them here: I feel deeply sorry to have (begun to) retired the wrong package. And thanks to Liang to have fixed that mistake! Kind regards Denis 2013/2/23 Michael Schwendt > On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:39:21 +0800, Liang Suilong wrote: > > > I have retire

Re: Obsolete packages still included in Fedora 19 development

2013-02-23 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:39:21 +0800, Liang Suilong wrote: > I have retired fcitx-keyboard. > > But Denis Arnaud cleaned up all code for fcitx(1). I think it should be > wrong. I have reverted the code back to git repo just now. Fcitx is still > fine and is widely used in CJK community. > > 1. >

Re: Obsolete packages still included in Fedora 19 development

2013-02-23 Thread Liang Suilong
I have retired fcitx-keyboard. But Denis Arnaud cleaned up all code for fcitx(1). I think it should be wrong. I have reverted the code back to git repo just now. Fcitx is still fine and is widely used in CJK community. 1. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/fcitx.git/commit/?id=c75a157fb353a2ace

Re: Obsolete packages still included in Fedora 19 development

2013-02-21 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Apparently, there are obsolete packages still in Rawhide (and have even > been rebuilt for the mass-rebuild, albeit not all of them). "Obsolete" > here really means they are obsoleted (=replaced!) by some other package. > > Whoever may be

Re: Obsolete packages still included in Fedora 19 development

2013-02-21 Thread Paul Wouters
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Michael Schwendt wrote: Apparently, there are obsolete packages still in Rawhide (and have even been rebuilt for the mass-rebuild, albeit not all of them). "Obsolete" here really means they are obsoleted (=replaced!) by some other package. Whoever may be responsible for thi