Yeah nice to see such things are available.
Using ssh to my own machine is not acceptable for me. This would mean
a higher bill
for energy :) Well I think I will stick to OBS as it is now, may the
other maintainer Xiao-Long
wants to get the packages into main Fedora. OBS perfectly suites my
needs,
Rahul Sundaram a écrit:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers
This is really nice. I wasn't aware people could have access to remote
Rawhide machines for testing purposes. I guess it won't be really
useful for maintainers of packages that requires Xorg
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 12:31 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> He seems to be talking about a web interface that lets you edit specs
> and submit builds - some kind of basic text editor webapp hooked up to
> the spec repository, I guess.
If you really need this, and don't have any basic editing/chec
Damian Ivanov wrote:
> Of course I do Fedora and SuSE on my PC. But from Mo-Fr. I am not at home
> and use my companie's laptop where I can not install Linux and
> wouldn't really like
> to install additional software. And having two laptops around would be
> too much :)
Are you not even allowed t
On 07/29/2012 10:17 PM, Damian Ivanov wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback guys.
>
> Of course I do Fedora and SuSE on my PC. But from Mo-Fr. I am not at home
> and use my companie's laptop where I can not install Linux and
> wouldn't really like
> to install additional software. And having two laptop
Thanks for the feedback guys.
Of course I do Fedora and SuSE on my PC. But from Mo-Fr. I am not at home
and use my companie's laptop where I can not install Linux and
wouldn't really like
to install additional software. And having two laptops around would be
too much :)
How can I package Fedora p
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/28/2012 09:33 PM, devzero2000 wrote:
>
>> why don't use lauchpad instead ? Because it use bazar as dvcs ?
>> Really ? But no.
>
> Launchpad is not a build system.
Well, no, not now, but once it becomes self-aware, who knows?
-J
>
On 07/28/2012 09:33 PM, devzero2000 wrote:
> why don't use lauchpad instead ? Because it use bazar as dvcs ?
> Really ? But no.
Launchpad is not a build system.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> He seems to be talking about a web interface that lets you edit specs
> and submit builds - some kind of basic text editor webapp hooked up to
> the spec repository, I guess.
I don't know if we need a webapp. But some prespun up virtual i
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 17:50 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Damian Ivanov
> wrote:
> > First Thanks for the link and the answer.
> > The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now:
> > http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/
> >
> > Second t
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 19:23 +0300, Damian Ivanov wrote:
> First Thanks for the link and the answer.
> The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now:
> http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/
>
> Second the problem with koji is that I have no web interface. I am
> one of th
Sorry for the top posting.
Just my 1 cent , i follow only fedora.
But the answer could be only: political in first place. But this is
the same for every distro, and this is true, in particular, for every
distro rpm based for some reason. Every major rpm distro have its
buildsystem, its bugtracker
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Damian Ivanov wrote:
> First Thanks for the link and the answer.
> The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now:
> http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/
>
> Second the problem with koji is that I have no web interface. I am
It does have
Le samedi 28 juillet 2012 à 19:23 +0300, Damian Ivanov a écrit :
> First Thanks for the link and the answer.
> The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now:
> http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/
Yes, but that doesn't mean this is sustainable. from my experience, the
i
On 07/28/2012 09:53 PM, Damian Ivanov wrote:
> First Thanks for the link and the answer.
> The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now:
> http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/
>
> Second the problem with koji is that I have no web interface. I am
> one of the maintaine
First Thanks for the link and the answer.
The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now:
http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/
Second the problem with koji is that I have no web interface. I am
one of the maintainers of the experimental unity for Fedora and I do a few ot
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Damian Ivanov wrote:
> What would stop Fedora from doing this switch?
First, I'll completely ignore the question of what's wrong with what
we have now.
Second, speaking as one who tried to port OBS to a RHEL platform once
[1]: because of version dependency hell,
17 matches
Mail list logo
