Re: Nothing provides libgnat-10.so()(64bit)

2020-12-08 Thread Björn Persson
Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 12/8/20 10:26 AM, Björn Persson wrote: > > This time I got eight separate Bugzilla issues, which all essentially > > just served as notification that GCC has been upgraded, and each one > > needs to be closed manually. That's manageable as long as the number of > > Ada pack

Re: Nothing provides libgnat-10.so()(64bit)

2020-12-08 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12/8/20 10:26 AM, Björn Persson wrote: This time I got eight separate Bugzilla issues, which all essentially just served as notification that GCC has been upgraded, and each one needs to be closed manually. That's manageable as long as the number of Ada packages is small, but it still feels li

Re: Nothing provides libgnat-10.so()(64bit)

2020-12-08 Thread Björn Persson
Jeff Law wrote: > On 12/7/20 11:07 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 06:29:51PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> Hello. Apparently, many packages in rawhide require > >> libgnat-10.so()(64bit): > > I'm not a provenpackager, so I'm afraid I can't do that myself. > > Perhaps th

Re: Nothing provides libgnat-10.so()(64bit)

2020-12-07 Thread Jeff Law
On 12/7/20 1:48 PM, Pavel Zhukov wrote: > Hi Jeff. > Thank you for rebuilding xmlada. I'll continue from there as I want to > use this bootstrap to update packages to newest upstream version > anyway . ACK.  That'll definitely help.  I'll keep my gprbuild bits here (they aren't complete/working a

Re: Nothing provides libgnat-10.so()(64bit)

2020-12-07 Thread Pavel Zhukov
Hi Jeff. Thank you for rebuilding xmlada. I'll continue from there as I want to use this bootstrap to update packages to newest upstream version anyway . On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 7:25 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > > > On 12/7/20 11:07 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 06:29:51PM +0100,

Re: Nothing provides libgnat-10.so()(64bit)

2020-12-07 Thread Jeff Law
On 12/7/20 11:07 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 06:29:51PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> Hello. Apparently, many packages in rawhide require libgnat-10.so()(64bit): > I'm not a provenpackager, so I'm afraid I can't do that myself. > Perhaps the maintainers can just rebuild the

Re: Nothing provides libgnat-10.so()(64bit)

2020-12-07 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 06:29:51PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello. Apparently, many packages in rawhide require libgnat-10.so()(64bit): I'm not a provenpackager, so I'm afraid I can't do that myself. Perhaps the maintainers can just rebuild them themselves? Jakub _