Re: Non responsive packager: mmahut

2020-07-27 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 27. 07. 20 16:06, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 03:46:17PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 27. 07. 20 15:42, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 03:33:19PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 27. 07. 20 10:39, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Good Morning Everyone, I ha

Re: Non responsive packager: mmahut

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 03:46:17PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 27. 07. 20 15:42, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 03:33:19PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 27. 07. 20 10:39, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > > > > > I have been trying to

Re: Non responsive packager: mmahut

2020-07-27 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 27. 07. 20 15:42, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 03:33:19PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 27. 07. 20 10:39, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a whi

Re: Non responsive packager: mmahut

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 03:33:19PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 27. 07. 20 10:39, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account > > associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to > > d

Re: Non responsive packager: mmahut

2020-07-27 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 27. 07. 20 10:39, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers which is