On 22/08/2021 13:52, Ankur Sinha wrote:
An example of what, though?
All Flatpaks with --filesystem={home,system}.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an em
Thank you Ankur
Happy to move forward with your help.
On 2021-08-22 12:52, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 11:31:32 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On
21/08/2021 10:57, Ankur Sinha wrote: So, if we can do anything to make
it easier for developers to just
maintain their one or
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 11:31:32 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 21/08/2021 10:57, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > So, if we can do anything to make it easier for developers to just
> > maintain their one or two tools for the Fedora community, that'll be
> > good.
>
> And we will get a lot of low-
On 21/08/2021 10:57, Ankur Sinha wrote:
So, if we can do anything to make it easier for developers to just
maintain their one or two tools for the Fedora community, that'll be
good.
And we will get a lot of low-quality packages with bundled a lot of
libraries, ignoring Fedora build flags, guid
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 17:22:59 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Ankur Sinha [20/08/2021 12:27] :
> >
> > I totally understand the point of the system we have in place, but I do
> > see how it doesn't quite address the case of upstream developers or
> > individuals who'd just like to maintain their
* Ankur Sinha [20/08/2021 12:27] :
>
> I totally understand the point of the system we have in place, but I do
> see how it doesn't quite address the case of upstream developers or
> individuals who'd just like to maintain their few packages.
To be fair, the system does address the case of the up
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 11:34:51 +0100, Joan Moreau via devel wrote:
> Package is created properly, spec file is already maintained : https://
> github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/tree/master/PACKAGES/RPM
>
>
> but now, honestly, I don't really know what to do.
>
> Any help very welcome
Well, "pushing i
On 20/08/2021 12:34, Joan Moreau via devel wrote:
but now, honestly, I don't really know what to do.
You need to find a sponsor:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
__
Package is created properly, spec file is already maintained :
https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/tree/master/PACKAGES/RPM
but now, honestly, I don't really know what to do.
Any help very welcome
On 2021-08-18 20:09, Ben Beasley wrote:
Relevant history:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
Relevant history:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340
https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/issues/82
In short, a package was submitted and approved, but the submitter (who
is also the upstream author) is discouraged by the need to seek
sponsorship into the packager group.
---
Hi
How to find someone able to push the code in a RPM package ?
Reminder
- Source code : https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/
- Reference : https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/fts/
- Existing ArchLinux package (not AUR)
:https://archlinux.org/packages/?q=dovecot-fts-xapian
- Exi
11 matches
Mail list logo
