On 02/17/2015 05:24 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Right now, we are facing packages whose (non-gcc related) F22-bugs are
unfixable because the issues w/ GCC-5 F23 are propagating through.
Time to revert GCC (with Epoch bump) to 4.9 in F22?
No, though I believe pushing GCC-5 i
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> IMO, this was a bad and non-helpful decision. They should not have
> pushed any GCC-5 "this late in the cycle" and should have waited with
> pushing GCC-5 to rawhide until F22 is release.
+1
We have never done a GCC bump without a mass rebuild before, not even where
there
On 02/16/2015 07:43 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:35:17AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
FESCo decided to not do a mass rebuild for f22, but gcc-5 (with a
change to config from f23) was approved to land in f22.
- A GCC-5 has been pushed to rawhide and already _is_ being used t
On 02/16/2015 11:33 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
- A GCC-5 was pushed to F22 (I thought FESCO had decided _not_ to push
GCC-5 to F22) and already is causing FTBFSes there[1]
They decided to push GCC 5 to F22, but with the GCC 4 C++ ABI as the default
C++ ABI to avoid having to
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 02:33 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Seg, 2015-02-16 at 23:33 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > - A GCC-5 was pushed to F22 (I thought FESCO had decided _not_ to push
> > > GCC-5 to F22) and already is causing FTBFSes there[1]
> >
> > They decided to
On Seg, 2015-02-16 at 23:33 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > - A GCC-5 was pushed to F22 (I thought FESCO had decided _not_ to push
> > GCC-5 to F22) and already is causing FTBFSes there[1]
>
> They decided to push GCC 5 to F22, but with the GCC 4 C++ ABI as the default
> C+
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> - A GCC-5 was pushed to F22 (I thought FESCO had decided _not_ to push
> GCC-5 to F22) and already is causing FTBFSes there[1]
They decided to push GCC 5 to F22, but with the GCC 4 C++ ABI as the default
C++ ABI to avoid having to rebuild everything C++ this late in the cy
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 19:43:26 +0100
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> There are bugs being fixed both on the gcc side and on the side of
> packages, I think it is too early for the final mass rebuild, but gcc
> should be ready for that in a short time. For the gcc side of
> bugfixing it doesn't help that th
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:35:17AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> FESCo decided to not do a mass rebuild for f22, but gcc-5 (with a
> change to config from f23) was approved to land in f22.
>
> > - A GCC-5 has been pushed to rawhide and already _is_ being used to
> > build packages and causing all
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 19:08:23 +0100
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/16/2015 06:52 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > Probibly in the next few weeks as soon as gcc5 is ready
>
> I do not understand.
>
> - A GCC-5 was pushed to F22 (I thought FESCO had decided _not_ to
> push GCC-5 to F22) and already is
On 02/16/2015 06:52 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Probibly in the next few weeks as soon as gcc5 is ready
I do not understand.
- A GCC-5 was pushed to F22 (I thought FESCO had decided _not_ to push
GCC-5 to F22) and already is causing FTBFSes there[1]
- A GCC-5 has been pushed to rawhide and alre
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:15:31 +0100
Milan Crha wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 16:40 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 08:33:48AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > > Trying to build cmake, getting:
> >
> > In F23, all C++ packages need to be rebuilt, most likely you have a
>
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 16:40 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 08:33:48AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > Trying to build cmake, getting:
>
> In F23, all C++ packages need to be rebuilt, most likely you have a
> dependency, that hasn't been rebuilt yet (libjsoncpp)?
> So talk
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 08:33:48AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Trying to build cmake, getting:
In F23, all C++ packages need to be rebuilt, most likely you have a
dependency, that hasn't been rebuilt yet (libjsoncpp)?
So talk to the maintainer to rebuild it first.
Jakub
--
devel mail
14 matches
Mail list logo