On 4/13/2010 14:07, James Laska wrote:
> I see, thanks for the clarification. Is there a better way you would
> recommend to locate a sponsor for the packager of beakerlib (pmuller)?
Before anyone will sponsor a prospective packager the person should
first do some informal package reviews to dem
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 13:58 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "JL" == James Laska writes:
>
> JL> I take it from your response that you're not interested in reviewing
> JL> and sponsoring this package review request?
>
> Again, we don't sponsor packages or package review requests. We s
> "JL" == James Laska writes:
JL> I take it from your response that you're not interested in reviewing
JL> and sponsoring this package review request?
Again, we don't sponsor packages or package review requests. We sponsor
packagers. Packagers need to demonstrate various things before some
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 12:55 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "AW" == Adam Williamson writes:
>
> AW> I think it was just a thinko for 'review'.
>
> In which case, why would a sponsor be required at all? James is in the
> packager group, so he could just do the review. According to th
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 12:55 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "AW" == Adam Williamson writes:
>
> AW> I think it was just a thinko for 'review'.
>
> In which case, why would a sponsor be required at all? James is in the
> packager group, so he could just do the review.
> According to
> "AW" == Adam Williamson writes:
AW> I think it was just a thinko for 'review'.
In which case, why would a sponsor be required at all? James is in the
packager group, so he could just do the review. According to the ticket
in question, a sponsor for the packager is required (FE-NEEDSPONSO
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 12:33 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "JL" == James Laska writes:
>
> JL> Greetings folks, Is anyone interested in sponsoring a new package
> JL> used in several upcoming AutoQA test cases?
>
> We don't sponsor packages, we sponsor packagers. Has the packager i
> "JL" == James Laska writes:
JL> Greetings folks, Is anyone interested in sponsoring a new package
JL> used in several upcoming AutoQA test cases?
We don't sponsor packages, we sponsor packagers. Has the packager in
question done any other review work? Submitted other packages for
inspec
