On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 05:11:27PM +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hallo,
>
> because I have got issues with the gcc-4.7 compiler suite i have
> contacted the
> upstream of the gnustep project to get a solution for my issues.
>
> He has advic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18.01.2012 18:10, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 01/18/2012 05:03 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> Ah, right. The old Objective-C runtime API has been removed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00571.html And, I guess the
gnustep maintainers don't
On 01/18/2012 05:10 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> so it is surprising that gnustep maintainers didn't bother to do anything
> to move toward objc/runtime.h. And it surprises me that clang actually
> didn't remove that header too, I'd have thought that Nicola Pero
> removed it because it was gone in c
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 06:03:05PM +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 18.01.2012 17:57, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >
> >> The issue was, that during thu build of gnustep-base I have got a
> >> error messag which told me, that the file objc/objc-api.
On 01/18/2012 05:03 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> On 18.01.2012 17:57, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> >
>>> >> The issue was, that during thu build of gnustep-base I have got a
>>> >> error messag which told me, that the file objc/objc-api.h was not
>>> >> found.
>>> >>
>>> >> So I have ask upstream for supp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18.01.2012 17:57, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>> The issue was, that during thu build of gnustep-base I have got a
>> error messag which told me, that the file objc/objc-api.h was not
>> found.
>>
>> So I have ask upstream for support to solve this issue
On 01/18/2012 04:53 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> On 18.01.2012 17:25, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> > On 01/18/2012 04:11 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>> > It might be more helpful to tell us what these issues are. While
>> > LLVM might well be OK on x86, I'm less convinced about support for
>> > other arches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18.01.2012 17:25, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 01/18/2012 04:11 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> It might be more helpful to tell us what these issues are. While
> LLVM might well be OK on x86, I'm less convinced about support for
> other arches.
The issue
On 01/18/2012 04:11 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> because I have got issues with the gcc-4.7 compiler suite i have
> contacted the
> upstream of the gnustep project to get a solution for my issues.
>
> He has adviced me to migrate the gnustep stuff to clang/llvm. Espeicially
> some gnustep stuff lik
