On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 21:32 -0400, Mohammed Morsi wrote:
> Hey just to follow up, the mistake was on my part I believe. I was using
> the ancient ruby-activerecord package, which will soon be retired as it
> has long since been replaced w/ rubygem-activerecord.
>
> I'm still not sure why ruby-ac
Hey just to follow up, the mistake was on my part I believe. I was using
the ancient ruby-activerecord package, which will soon be retired as it
has long since been replaced w/ rubygem-activerecord.
I'm still not sure why ruby-activerecord didn't work, especially with
rubygem-activesupport inst
