On 09/27/2016 09:32 PM, Roman Tsisyk wrote:
My package uses getprotobyname(3), getaddrinfo(3), getnameinfo(3)
functions which read /etc/protocols, /etc/hosts, /etc/services and
other network configuration files under the hood.
Despite the fact that all these functions is an integral part of
glib
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Björn Esser wrote:
>
> Yes, because it usually gets installed by `basesystem` and `filesystem`
> packages; if those packages are missing, you broke your system anyways…
>
docker run -t -i fedora:24 /bin/bash
[root@896ac6d48718 /]# dnf remove setup
Dependencies re
Am 27.09.2016 um 22:08 schrieb Roman Tsisyk:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Björn Esser wrote:
Forgot to mention: Explicit dependencies are usually the better way,
instead of relying on implicit dependencies…
Of course.
File Dependencies
RPM gives you the ability to depend on files inst
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Björn Esser wrote:
>
> Forgot to mention: Explicit dependencies are usually the better way,
> instead of relying on implicit dependencies…
>
Of course.
> File Dependencies
> RPM gives you the ability to depend on files instead of packages. Whenever
> possible
Am 27.09.2016 um 21:48 schrieb Björn Esser:
Am 27.09.2016 um 21:32 schrieb Roman Tsisyk:
Hi,
My package uses getprotobyname(3), getaddrinfo(3), getnameinfo(3)
functions which read /etc/protocols, /etc/hosts, /etc/services and
other network configuration files under the hood.
Despite the fact th
Am 27.09.2016 um 21:32 schrieb Roman Tsisyk:
Hi,
My package uses getprotobyname(3), getaddrinfo(3), getnameinfo(3)
functions which read /etc/protocols, /etc/hosts, /etc/services and
other network configuration files under the hood.
Despite the fact that all these functions is an integral part of
