Once upon a time, Pavel Solovev said:
> MATE follows the even stable / odd unstable versioning system. 1.27 is an
> under development,pre-release.
Ahh, my mistake then! Sorry about that. I guess I run into that type
of versioning less these days, so it didn't cross my mind.
Now if I can just
MATE follows the even stable / odd unstable versioning system. 1.27 is an under
development,pre-release.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:09:42 -0700
Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Mar 14, 2014 7:52 AM, "Brian Millett" wrote:
> >
> > What is the prospect of getting mate 1.8 for fedora 20?
>
> Prospect is good.
>
> We're QAing on Rawhide at the moment.
>
> Dan
>
> Sent from my Google Nexus 5
I'm quivering with a
On Mar 14, 2014 7:52 AM, "Brian Millett" wrote:
>
> What is the prospect of getting mate 1.8 for fedora 20?
Prospect is good.
We're QAing on Rawhide at the moment.
Dan
Sent from my Google Nexus 5
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi
Stefano Karapetsas wrote:
>> Rex Dieter wrote:
>>
>> I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble
>> communicating and working together.
>>
>> I don't accept it. Dan reacting poorly is a given, and something he
>> (and I
>> with him) are working on.
>>
>> I personally don't
Rex Dieter wrote:
I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble
communicating and working together.
I don't accept it. Dan reacting poorly is a given, and something he
(and I
with him) are working on.
I personally don't feel it helps taking your greivances public, as
n
On 28/08/12 07:08, Michael Scherer wrote:
>
> Just stating facts as well, that's slightly wrong.
> Wolfgang aka raveit use the login "niceandgently" on github.
>
> The one who accuse Dan mashal of calling him "portuguese noob" is
> ketheriel, aka Nelson Marques, on 23-07-2012.
>
> He also reuse
On 2012-08-27 22:08, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le lundi 27 août 2012 à 17:48 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On 2012-08-24 13:49, Rave it wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had
trouble
> communicating and working together.
>
> I do wish to than
Le lundi 27 août 2012 à 17:48 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> On 2012-08-24 13:49, Rave it wrote:
> > Rex Dieter wrote:
> >
> > I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble
> > communicating and working together.
> >
> > I do wish to thank you for the positive contribution
On 2012-08-24 13:49, Rave it wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble
communicating and working together.
I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and
in
your future endeavors.
-- rex
No mercy, no thanks.
Why do you
Rex Dieter wrote:
> I don't accept it. Dan reacting poorly is a given, and something he
> (and I with him) are working on.
> I personally don't feel it helps taking your greivances public, as now
> Dan's perception of you (and now potentially others) will be colored
> as
> hostile.
Sorry, for me
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Rave it wrote:
> >
> > Rex Dieter wrote:
> >
> > I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble
> > communicating and working together.
> >
> > I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and in
> > your future endeavors.
Rave it wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble
> communicating and working together.
>
> I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and in
> your future endeavors.
> No mercy, no thanks.
>
> Why do you Mr. Rex Die
Rex Dieter wrote:
I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble
communicating and working together.
I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and in
your future endeavors.
-- rex
No mercy, no thanks.
Why do you Mr. Rex Dieter as sponsor accept rude
>
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble
> communicating and working together.
>
> I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and in
> your future endeavors.
>
> -- rex
>
No mercy, no thanks.
Why do you Mr. Rex Dieter
Rex Dieter wrote:
I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble
communicating and working together.
I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and in
your future endeavors.
-- rex
No mercy, no thanks.
Why do you Mr. Rex Dieter as sponsor accept rude
On 08/23/2012 04:53 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Rave it wrote:
For your information.
I stoped working for the Mate-Desktop project for f18 because
I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble
communicating and working together.
I do wish to thank you for the positive contrib
Rave it wrote:
> For your information.
> I stoped working for the Mate-Desktop project for f18 because
I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble
communicating and working together.
I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and in your
future ende
Brendan Jones wrote:
> I understand Dan's fairly new to Fedora - perhaps his sponsor should
> have a word with him.
Would it be enough to CC Rex? Or should we open a ticket on a trac of
one of the Fedora committees?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
On 08/21/2012 11:50 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
As a reminder, everyone working within the Fedora project is expected to
abide by the code of conduct (http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct).
If there's an interpersonal conflict that can't be resolved by the
individuals or the specific subset of
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> "Ri" == Rave it writes:
>
> Ri> For your information. I stoped working for the Mate-Desktop project
> Ri> for f18 because for me it is imposssible to to work together with
> Ri> Dan Mashal. One of the reason for my decision is th
As a reminder, everyone working within the Fedora project is expected to
abide by the code of conduct (http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct).
If there's an interpersonal conflict that can't be resolved by the
individuals or the specific subset of the project involved, please feel
free to ra
> "Ri" == Rave it writes:
Ri> For your information. I stoped working for the Mate-Desktop project
Ri> for f18 because for me it is imposssible to to work together with
Ri> Dan Mashal. One of the reason for my decision is this last talk with
Ri> Dan Mashal today.
I've watched a bunch of this
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
[Reviving an old thread ...]
Indeed this seems to be not just vapourware:
http://cinnamon.linuxmint.com/?p=119
I don't buy the arguments that MATE is vapourware, but building a new
Gnome-2-like desktop on the Gnome 3 underpinnings obviously is easier
and in the lon
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:24:08PM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 12:50 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > On 12/09/2011 03:50 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
> >> I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
> >> desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate
2011-12-10 16:36 keltezéssel, Rahul Sundaram írta:
> On 12/10/2011 03:30 PM, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
> u
>> Not so fast, there was a point in time when
>> the whole Linux development community
>> was Linus Torvalds. Live and let live.
> You would have a better point there if MATE was a new deskto
On 12/10/2011 03:30 PM, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
u
> Not so fast, there was a point in time when
> the whole Linux development community
> was Linus Torvalds. Live and let live.
You would have a better point there if MATE was a new desktop
environment trying to grow a community. GNOME 2.x is a c
Hi.
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:00:55 +0100, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote
> Not so fast, there was a point in time when
> the whole Linux development community
> was Linus Torvalds. Live and let live.
Yes, there was. But it was a) rather short, and b) did not have
a codebase even remotely comparable to t
2011-12-09 11:34 keltezéssel, Kevin Kofler írta:
>> and there is a development community.
> LOL, a "community" called Timothy Pearson…
>
> Don't make me laugh.
>
> Kevin Kofler
Not so fast, there was a point in time when
the whole Linux development community
was Linus Torvalds. Live and le
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Am 10.12.2011 01:20, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> So I'm sceptical about MATE (seeing what's going on with Trinity)
> and I can only strongly discourage attempting to package Trinity.
I agree to that point of view. IMHO MATE is a waste of time and
manpow
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> It is not useful to generalize. There are lots of software components
> which aren't actively maintained but are useful to have in the
> distribution and all distributions have them however a desktop
> environment is a lot of work to maintain (as seen for instance in
> http:
On 12/09/2011 05:42 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 11:58 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
one
>> developer? I am worried about sustainability.
>>> > > How can you be worried about maintainability given that we
>>> already have
>>> > unmaintained and poorly maintained pac
On 12/09/2011 12:50 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 03:50 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
>> I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
>> desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
>> GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few mon
On 12/09/2011 11:58 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> one
>>> >> developer? I am worried about sustainability.
>> >
>> > How can you be worried about maintainability given that we already have
>> > unmaintained and poorly maintained packages in the distribution?
> When you have problems, the solu
On 12/09/2011 05:17 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 04:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 12/09/2011 09:20 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
>>> I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
>>> desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
>
On 12/09/2011 03:50 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
> I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
> desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
> GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months to package the
> remaining MATE packages.
>
> Would anyo
On 12/09/2011 04:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 09:20 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
>> I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
>> desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
>> GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months to pa
Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> What do you think about Trinity Desktop? I liked KDE3. Is there a
> chance to include this DE in Fedora?
Please NO! We worked hard on making kdelibs3 apps work well in KDE Plasma 4
sessions. Trying to support Trinity sessions too is going to make a big
mess. Another big
On 09/12/11 07:03, Eric Smith wrote:
>
> I tried switching to Xfce, and found it to be a lot better than Gnome 3,
> but it was still missing a lot of things I'm accustomed to in Gnome 2.
>
> I'm not trying to start another advocacy thread. I'm just trying to
> package up an alternative for people
Hi,
What do you think about Trinity Desktop? I liked KDE3. Is there a
chance to include this DE in Fedora? Unlike the MATE, TD is well
maintained and there is a development community.
--
Best regards,
Michal
http://eventhorizon.pl/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://ad
Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2011, 19:50 -0800 schrieb Eric Smith:
> I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
> desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
> GNOME 2.
MATE is just replacing "gnome" with "mate" everywhere, whether or not it
w
Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> I'd rather help others with transition to Gnome3, as some active
members of our local
> community (Russian Fedora) does.
I've spent months trying to get used to Gnome 3, and had lots of help
from various people, and I still can't stand it. Yes, I know that there
are p
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 09:24 +0300, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello
>
> 2011/12/9 Eric Smith :
> > I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
> > desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
> > GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months
Hello
2011/12/9 Eric Smith :
> I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
> desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
> GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months to package the
> remaining MATE packages.
Mate is unmaintained (e.
On 12/09/2011 09:20 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
> I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
> desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
> GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months to package the
> remaining MATE packages.
>
> Would
45 matches
Mail list logo
