Re: Mass Pull Request filing for ambiguous Python 2 requirements

2017-12-06 Thread Iryna Shcherbina
Hi Richard, On 12/06/2017 02:04 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: Is there any harm in me going ahead and fixing my packages? Now that I have a list it would be quite easy. No harm at all, that will only help us. Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- d

Re: Mass Pull Request filing for ambiguous Python 2 requirements

2017-12-06 Thread Iryna Shcherbina
Hi, On 12/06/2017 01:59 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 12:19:24PM +0100, Iryna Shcherbina wrote: Hi all, Hi, It has been a while since the last discussion on Python packages naming policy, i.e. using "python2" instead of just "python", in preparation for makin

Re: Mass Pull Request filing for ambiguous Python 2 requirements

2017-12-06 Thread Richard Shaw
Is there any harm in me going ahead and fixing my packages? Now that I have a list it would be quite easy. Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Mass Pull Request filing for ambiguous Python 2 requirements

2017-12-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 12:19:24PM +0100, Iryna Shcherbina wrote: > Hi all, Hi, > It has been a while since the last discussion on Python packages > naming policy, i.e. using "python2" instead of just "python", in > preparation for making "python" mean Python 3. Thanks to zbyszek's > effort, most