Kevin Fenzi writes:
> I think I am with Remi on the above... shipping both for 1 release
> would be potentially helpful in seeing issues, we can ask people to
> migrate at that time and file bugs, if the bugs are stoppers they can
> go back to mysql until fixed. I guess it depends on the maintaine
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:52:17 +0100
Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 13/12/2012 18:32, Honza Horak a écrit :
>
> > 1. continue shipping only mysql
> > 2. ship mysql + mariadb, that would conflict
>
> Seems ok for 1 release.
>
> > 3. ship mysql + mariadb with adjusted file-names and using
> > alternative
Le 13/12/2012 18:32, Honza Horak a écrit :
> 1. continue shipping only mysql
> 2. ship mysql + mariadb, that would conflict
Seems ok for 1 release.
> 3. ship mysql + mariadb with adjusted file-names and using alternatives
> 4. ship mysql + mariadb with adjusted file-names but not using alternati
On 10/29/2012 04:36 AM, Sven Lankes wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:31:25PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Uh, conflicting with MySQL is really a no go (just look at how many things
require mysql-libs, and even mysql-server is required for Akonadi, and
mysql-embedded or Amarok), why isn't the for
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> So IMO I think now that we can accept different database tools into
> repo,it's available for us to include mariadb.Official says they will try to
> become a independent software but not a mod based on MySQL...
>
> Maybe easy for review? I
So IMO I think now that we can accept different database tools into
repo,it's available for us to include mariadb.Official says they will try
to become a independent software but not a mod based on MySQL...
Maybe easy for review? I don't know exactly...
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapro
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> I just found this.
>
> https://kb.askmonty.org/en/mariadb-1000-changelog
Nice find. Are you suggesting anything?
--
It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for;
it's just given. Respect isn't asked for; it's earn
I just found this.
https://kb.askmonty.org/en/mariadb-1000-changelog
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875150
Spec URL: http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/mariadb.spec
SRPM URL: http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/
--
It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for;
it's just given. Respect isn't asked for; it's earned!
Renich B
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 19:03 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:08:03PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 23:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Sven Lankes wrote:
> > > > mariadb will need to conflict with the default mysql packages
> > > > which is usu
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:08:03PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 23:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Sven Lankes wrote:
> > > mariadb will need to conflict with the default mysql packages
> > > which is usually not allowed in fedora. So this is going to
> > > be interesting
Am 30.10.2012 02:21, schrieb Tom Lane:
> Reindl Harald writes:
>> i doubt MariaDb would be interface-compatible in most cases
>> BUT not binary comatible as you can also not replace MySQL 5.1
>> against MySQL 5.5 without compat-packages (remi did outside
>> fedora-packages) as long depending pack
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 02:14 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 30.10.2012 02:08, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> >> don't get me wrong but where is subtlety necessary here?
> >>
> >> * mysql-libs is a widely used and linked library
> >> * postfix/sendmail/exim is a binary with alternative symlinks
> >>
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 21:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Reindl Harald writes:
> > i doubt MariaDb would be interface-compatible in most cases
> > BUT not binary comatible as you can also not replace MySQL 5.1
> > against MySQL 5.5 without compat-packages (remi did outside
> > fedora-packages) as lon
Reindl Harald writes:
> i doubt MariaDb would be interface-compatible in most cases
> BUT not binary comatible as you can also not replace MySQL 5.1
> against MySQL 5.5 without compat-packages (remi did outside
> fedora-packages) as long depending packages are linked against
> a specific version
Am 30.10.2012 02:08, schrieb Adam Williamson:
>> don't get me wrong but where is subtlety necessary here?
>>
>> * mysql-libs is a widely used and linked library
>> * postfix/sendmail/exim is a binary with alternative symlinks
>>
>> different worlds
>> different implications
>
> You're entirely m
Am 30.10.2012 01:58, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 01:20 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Well, we could also take the approach we take with MTAs; have a set of
>>> generic virtual Provides for MySQL-alikes and have all the MySQL-alikes
>>> we package Provide these, as well as P
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 02:03 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 30.10.2012 01:58, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> > On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 01:20 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>> Well, we could also take the approach we take with MTAs; have a set of
> >>> generic virtual Provides for MySQL-alikes and hav
Am 30.10.2012 01:08, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 23:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Sven Lankes wrote:
>>> mariadb will need to conflict with the default mysql packages
>>> which is usually not allowed in fedora. So this is going to
>>> be interesting.
>>
>> Uh, conflicting
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 01:20 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 30.10.2012 01:08, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> > On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 23:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> Sven Lankes wrote:
> >>> mariadb will need to conflict with the default mysql packages
> >>> which is usually not allowed in fed
On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 23:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Sven Lankes wrote:
> > mariadb will need to conflict with the default mysql packages
> > which is usually not allowed in fedora. So this is going to
> > be interesting.
>
> Uh, conflicting with MySQL is really a no go (just look at how many
Sorry,I want to know why should we talk about MySQLMariaDB team has
already posted [1] about MariaDB10.0...They said they don't just want to
become a 'brunch' of MySQL.
[1]--- https://blog.mariadb.org/mariadb-directions/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedora
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:31:25PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Uh, conflicting with MySQL is really a no go (just look at how many things
> require mysql-libs, and even mysql-server is required for Akonadi, and
> mysql-embedded or Amarok), why isn't the fork renaming its stuff? If the
> idea i
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Uh, conflicting with MySQL is really a no go (just look at how many things
> require mysql-libs, and even mysql-server is required for Akonadi, and
> mysql-embedded or Amarok), why isn't the fork renaming its stuff? If the
> idea is to be a 10
Sven Lankes wrote:
> mariadb will need to conflict with the default mysql packages
> which is usually not allowed in fedora. So this is going to
> be interesting.
Uh, conflicting with MySQL is really a no go (just look at how many things
require mysql-libs, and even mysql-server is required for A
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Sven Lankes wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I am to start packaging MariaDB for Fedora.
>
> I've promised monty to get going with packaging MariaDB and I did
> create some local test packages which do work still need quite a
> few changes. I got busy with $dayjob for a while but
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 01:52:18PM -0600, Renich Bon Ciric wrote:
Hi,
> I am to start packaging MariaDB for Fedora.
I've promised monty to get going with packaging MariaDB and I did
create some local test packages which do work still need quite a
few changes. I got busy with $dayjob for a while
27 matches
Mail list logo
