On 04/27/2015 01:11 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Telling users to install a F21 repo in F22 sounds like a recipe for
disaster. Should we really make it easier to do that?
Yes, it's not ideal, but I'm willing to close my nose and just do what's
needed if it gets us happier users.
You are prob
Telling users to install a F21 repo in F22 sounds like a recipe for
disaster. Should we really make it easier to do that?
We could point users towards Fluendo's MP3 gstreamer plugin in the
meantime
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 20:53:12 +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> I of course do not want to tell anyone what to spend their time on,
> but do you not think that this effort would be better spent helping
> the 3rd party repos (rpmfusion) getting ready for F22 than building
> compatibility layers?
Well,
On 04/26/2015 08:53 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> Also, there are bugs for gstreamer/totem (like
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186028), wouldn't your
> packages possibly introduce more problems like that?
That's something completely unrelated. I am not very familiar with the
codec in
2015-04-25 18:43 GMT+02:00 Kalev Lember :
> Hi,
>
> It turns out that some of the 3rd party repos that ship additional
> gstreamer codecs have been lagging behind and aren't ready for F22. At
> this point it's unclear if they'll manage to put out any recompiled F22
> packages in time of our GA rele
Kalev Lember wrote:
> It turns out that some of the 3rd party repos that ship additional
> gstreamer codecs have been lagging behind and aren't ready for F22. At
> this point it's unclear if they'll manage to put out any recompiled F22
> packages in time of our GA release.
That major third party r
