Re: Looking for co-maintainers for all my packages

2011-04-05 Thread Rick L. Vinyard, Jr.
Kevin Kofler wrote: > Debarshi Ray wrote: >> With the addition of GDbus in Glib, is dbus-cxx still needed? People >> should directly use the C++ bindings from glibmm, shouldn't they? > > Not everyone uses GLib… > Which is actually dbus-cxx' raison d'être. That, and the skeleton generator from

Re: Looking for co-maintainers for all my packages

2011-04-05 Thread Kevin Kofler
Debarshi Ray wrote: > With the addition of GDbus in Glib, is dbus-cxx still needed? People > should directly use the C++ bindings from glibmm, shouldn't they? Not everyone uses GLib… Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman

Re: Looking for co-maintainers for all my packages

2011-04-04 Thread Debarshi Ray
> I'm not going to orphan these packages, but I would like to find > co-maintainers for any and all of them as I find myself with less and less > time to give them the full attention they need. > [...] > * dbus-cxx With the addition of GDbus in Glib, is dbus-cxx still needed? People should directl

Re: Looking for co-maintainers for all my packages

2011-04-04 Thread Nathanael D. Noblet
On 04/04/2011 07:58 AM, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote: > * xournal I use this so I've applied for "co-maintainership"... -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel