Re: Looking for a proven packager to help merge some spec file cleanups

2020-02-04 Thread Tom Stellard
On 02/04/2020 06:07 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 9:02 PM Tom Stellard wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Is there a proven packager available to help me merge these: >> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/blktrace/pull-request/2 >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-lsb/pull-request

Re: Looking for a proven packager to help merge some spec file cleanups

2020-02-04 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 9:02 PM Tom Stellard wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there a proven packager available to help me merge these: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/blktrace/pull-request/2 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-lsb/pull-request/4 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dmidecode/p

Re: Looking for a proven packager

2016-07-01 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 01/07/16 10:57 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 30/06/16 16:27 +, Christopher wrote: On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:35 AM Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: First thing you should do is to send your patch upstream. If upstream will say "it's good p

Re: Looking for a proven packager

2016-07-01 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 30/06/16 16:27 +, Christopher wrote: On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:35 AM Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > First thing you should do is to send your patch upstream. If upstream > will say "it's good patch", I will help you to get it in Fedora bef

Re: Looking for a proven packager

2016-06-30 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:35 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Igor Gnatenko > wrote: > > First thing you should do is to send your patch upstream. If upstream > > will say "it's good patch", I will help you to get it in Fedora before > > upstream will release new versi

Re: Looking for a proven packager

2016-06-30 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Mattias Ellert wrote: > Hi! > > I submitted a bugzilla report with a patch that implements an > improvement of the hadoop package in Fedora, extending the current > incomplete Fedora integration patch that only supports ix86 and x86_64 > to more architectures. The

Re: Looking for a proven packager

2016-06-30 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > First thing you should do is to send your patch upstream. If upstream > will say "it's good patch", I will help you to get it in Fedora before > upstream will release new version. Unfortunately it's not possible in > other way. In the hadoop

Re: Looking for a proven packager

2016-06-30 Thread Igor Gnatenko
First thing you should do is to send your patch upstream. If upstream will say "it's good patch", I will help you to get it in Fedora before upstream will release new version. Unfortunately it's not possible in other way. Also there are some comments from random guys about code quality. On Thu, J