Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in March

On 25. 02. 22 9:51, Akira TAGOH wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 3:50 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: nim: sil-namdhinggo-fonts, yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts, gfs-decker-fonts, gfs-didot-fonts, gfs-bodoni-fonts, impallari-dancing-script-fonts, gfs-didot-display-fonts, typesetit-great-vibes-fonts, sil-charis-co

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in March

On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 3:50 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > nim: sil-namdhinggo-fonts, yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts, gfs-decker-fonts, > gfs-didot-fonts, gfs-bodoni-fonts, impallari-dancing-script-fonts, > gfs-didot-display-fonts, typesetit-great-vibes-fonts, > sil-charis-compact-fonts, > sil-tagmukay-fonts

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in March

On 2/3/22 17:39, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 02. 02. 22 17:36, Michael J Gruber wrote: Still the same fallout from that rage quit ... Do we have @nim on record saying they are no longer interested in maintaining their Fedora packages? If so, I'd like to get them orphaned, so we know where are the

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in March

On 02. 02. 22 17:36, Michael J Gruber wrote: Still the same fallout from that rage quit ... Do we have @nim on record saying they are no longer interested in maintaining their Fedora packages? If so, I'd like to get them orphaned, so we know where are the problematic packages before we have p

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in March

Still the same fallout from that rage quit ... I wouldn't mind taking adf-tribun-fonts (I already have two from that foundry), but I'm really wondering whether we should package fonts which no other package depends upon: It's easy for users to install them directly, packaged versions do not nec

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in March

I contacted Rahul and he made me a co-maintainer on the chocolate-doom package. I've pushed a commit that fixes the build failures and updates the package from v3.0.0 to v3.0.1. The builds for rawhide, f35 and f34 had finished and have been submitted to bodhi. A.FI. _

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in March

On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 3:41 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 02. 02. 22 10:41, Parag Nemade wrote: > > I have submitted PR > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/impallari-raleway-fonts/pull-request/2 > > < > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/impallari-raleway-fonts/pull-request/2> > > > which shou

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in March

On 02. 02. 22 10:41, Parag Nemade wrote: I have submitted PR https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/impallari-raleway-fonts/pull-request/2 which should fix that package building in Fedora releases. Thanks. I am afraid @ni

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in March

On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 7:39 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following > packages > should be retired from Fedora 36 approximately one week before branching. > > However, 5 weekly reminders are required and I forgot to start

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in March

> chocolate-doomsundaram I've managed to get this to build successfully in koji. I'll try to contact the maintainer, though looking at bugzilla, they haven't been active since April 2020. I'm willing to adopt the package should the maintainer drop it or be declared unresponsiv