Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 2 February 2010 15:12, Sebastian Vahl
> wrote:
>> * setroubleshoot introduced a hard dependency on gnome-packagekit
>> (#561001) * The dependency should be made generic or setroubleshoot has
>> to be removed from KDE spin.
>
> Is it just a dep on the PackageKit session
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 07:59:38PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 2 February 2010 15:44, Till Maas wrote:
> > While you are fixing PackageKit dependencies, can you also remove the
> > PackageKit-yum-plugin dependency from PackageKit? The plugin seems not
> > to be necessary, as it can be disabl
On 2 February 2010 15:44, Till Maas wrote:
> While you are fixing PackageKit dependencies, can you also remove the
> PackageKit-yum-plugin dependency from PackageKit? The plugin seems not
> to be necessary, as it can be disabled in
> /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/refresh-packagekit.conf and still the gnom
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 03:28:03PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 2 February 2010 15:12, Sebastian Vahl wrote:
> > * setroubleshoot introduced a hard dependency on gnome-packagekit (#561001)
> > * The dependency should be made generic or setroubleshoot has to be removed
> > from KDE spin.
>
>
On 2 February 2010 15:12, Sebastian Vahl wrote:
> * setroubleshoot introduced a hard dependency on gnome-packagekit (#561001)
> * The dependency should be made generic or setroubleshoot has to be removed
> from KDE spin.
Is it just a dep on the PackageKit session API? If so can't we just
add a vi
