On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:24 +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> On Thursday 25 November 2010 21:29:30 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> > > You may ask, don't we have enough of those already? Don't we have
> > > NetworkManager, connman, netcf, and a
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
>
> Presenting wicked network configuration
> ===
>
> This is the first public release of wicked, an experimental framework
> for network configuration.
The project name is pretty close to wicd, also
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:24:34AM +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> On Thursday 25 November 2010 21:29:30 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> > > You may ask, don't we have enough of those already? Don't we have
> > > NetworkManager, connman, netcf,
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:24:34 +0100
Olaf Kirch wrote:
> 3. Why not NetworkManager?
>
> On the other hand, there's NetworkManager (and I'm getting to this point
> because Pete Zaitcev brought this up). Right now, NetworkManager doesn't
> handle bridges, bonds, infiniband, token ring - that's why I
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 04:02:28PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> Hi Olaf,
>
> Thanks for posting about your project.
>
> On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:24 +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
>
> > 1. ifcfg files are dead
>
> Ok. But I think we want to be very careful with this. Yes, it's nice to
> use structured
Hi Olaf,
Thanks for posting about your project.
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:24 +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> 1. ifcfg files are dead
Ok. But I think we want to be very careful with this. Yes, it's nice to
use structured data formats but IMO we want to make sure sysadmins can
still edit files by hand
On Thursday 25 November 2010 21:29:30 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> > You may ask, don't we have enough of those already? Don't we have
> > NetworkManager, connman, netcf, and a few more?
>
> Indeed ... You don't explain how it's better
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:17:48PM +0100, nodata wrote:
> On 25/11/10 17:24, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> >
> > Presenting wicked network configuration
> > ===
> >
> > This is the first public release of wicked, an experimental framework
> > for network configuration.
> >
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 17:24 +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> Presenting wicked network configuration
> ===
>
> This is the first public release of wicked, an experimental framework
> for network configuration.
>
> You may ask, don't we have enough of those already? D
On 25/11/10 17:24, Olaf Kirch wrote:
>
> Presenting wicked network configuration
> ===
>
> This is the first public release of wicked, an experimental framework
> for network configuration.
>
> You may ask, don't we have enough of those already? Don't we have
> N
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 20:29:30 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> > You may ask, don't we have enough of those already? Don't we have
> > NetworkManager, connman, netcf, and a few more?
>
> Indeed ... You don't explain how it's better
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> You may ask, don't we have enough of those already? Don't we have
> NetworkManager, connman, netcf, and a few more?
Indeed ... You don't explain how it's better than netcf.
I notice a lot of hand-written C config file parsing in your
12 matches
Mail list logo
